What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

'10 CA C Dennis Kramer (Signed to San Diego)

Sexton Hardcastle

Club Member
Club Member
Rivals
Scout
ESPN
Dennis_Kramer_-_L_Keith_Miller_-_R.jpg

La Costa Canyon H.S. (Carlsbad, CA)

Ht: 6'9"
Wt: 215
 
Re: '10 CA C Dennis Kramer

ESPN Eval:

October, 2007: Kramer possesses a great frame and has overall nice length for the "five" at the next level. He has long arms, soft hands, and ever-improving footwork in the paint area. He isn't overly bouncy, but he's quick enough around the basket to convert over most bigs. He runs fairly smooth in transition and has the ability to hit the pull-up in transition although that part of his game is in its infantile stage. On the other hand, in the half-court set he can step out and hit the mid-range shot at the elbow with regularity. His stroke is smooth and his release is tight. Despite his ideal size and overall length, Kramer has to get stronger and considerably tougher to make an immediate impact at the Division I level. He gets pushed around too easily against high-level competition and needs to much more assertive and aggressive when it comes to rebounding and finishing at the rim.

http://insider.espn.go.com/ncb/recr...ncb/recruiting/tracker/player?recruitId=55261
 
Re: '10 CA C Dennis Kramer

Either he had a big Junior year and/or he was impressive at a March event. ESPN's March 2009 evaluation is much better. He's now their #33 PF with a 90 rating. Sounds like if we get him into the new MBB strength & conditioning program he could be a heck of a player:

March, 2009: Kramer is one of the most skilled and fundamentally sound bigs in the west. He has a terrific looking frame with long arms and he's deceptively bouncy as well. He has feathery shooting touch out to the stripe and his foot work in the post is solid. However, he is very unassertive underneath the basket and a poor rebounder for his size. He doesn't appear to like contact and he is quite comfortable floating around the perimeter shooting 3's. Kramer has all the tools to play at the high-major level, but if he wants to make a significant impact at the high-major level he's going to play with much more passion and purpose.
 
Re: '10 CA C Dennis Kramer

It's good to have you posting here BuffNik. I hope you decide to stick around Allbuffs. I enjoy your posts. :thumbsup:
 
Re: '10 CA C Dennis Kramer

Either he had a big Junior year and/or he was impressive at a March event. ESPN's March 2009 evaluation is much better. He's now their #33 PF with a 90 rating. Sounds like if we get him into the new MBB strength & conditioning program he could be a heck of a player:

March, 2009: Kramer is one of the most skilled and fundamentally sound bigs in the west. He has a terrific looking frame with long arms and he's deceptively bouncy as well. He has feathery shooting touch out to the stripe and his foot work in the post is solid. However, he is very unassertive underneath the basket and a poor rebounder for his size. He doesn't appear to like contact and he is quite comfortable floating around the perimeter shooting 3's. Kramer has all the tools to play at the high-major level, but if he wants to make a significant impact at the high-major level he's going to play with much more passion and purpose.

Not sure if we need another Andy Osborn at this point. I liked Osborn so I'm not trying to slam him, we just need a rebounder.
 
Re: '10 CA C Dennis Kramer

Agree, but I'm just going to be blunt - Osborn thoroughly disappointed me. I thought he would be more agile than he was, but he really wasn't. That was fine though, because I thought he could be a lethal shooter. He wasn't. He was serviceable...but NOT what our team needs. We need someone that has some swagger inside to grab some rebounds.
 
Back
Top