It would be quickly forgotten if he played well and would even turn into a positive story and message to future recruits from the state of CO if we would have taken him back. He could talk to kids from CO. and say the grass looks greener down in Florida but it sure isn't all it cracked up to be.
I am sure he would have been welcome to walk on, and prove he deserves the spot.Originally Posted by o_robbie
He won't have to sit out a year at UNC will he?
I think because its d-2 he is good to go this year
UNC is 1-AA (or FCS or whatever they call it now...), not D-II. I think he can still transfer without sitting out, though...
12-PAC here we come!!
Ah that makes more sense, I get 1-AA and D-II mixed up often
Clemons picked UM over Colorado. We were in it for him.
PRich got caught stealing a purse and got kicked out of UCLA. We got a visit from him and definitely had a shot. I believe he liked Kiesau a lot. If there was ever an example to use in your argument, PRich would be it.Richardson signed because of an issue in LA that got cleared up. Was a very good prospect coming out of high school and I do not believe CU originally had a shot.
I don't see the difference. I'm just fussy like that.Willingham had us in his top two, his parents urged him to go to CU, he talked us up, and then picked up the UCF hat. He chose C-USA over the Pac-12. He chose a non AQ school over an AQ school. He was the local star that looked like he would chose CU and then didnt. It would be awkward. Lots of the kids on the team I am sure would remember that.
Last edited by exxon; 01-10-2012 at 11:52 PM.
Someone needs to advise Leilon that he should send his HS video to more coaches. UNC is not good enough for him. Still shaking my head that he went to UCF and now UNC more head shaking. Maybe his girlfriend attends UNC.
I would have taken him at CU and let him Redshirt and sit this year to give him 3 to play 3.
I am surprised CSU didn't make this same offer.
I hope the in state kids that blow off CU read this story. The grass is rarely greener on the other side.
Also, are highly rated Colorado kids, generally, over rated? Or is the Colorado percentage of failure the same as the national?
Last edited by DBT; 01-13-2012 at 11:17 PM.
I don't think that Colorado kids are over-rated.
My theory (which could be horribly wrong) is that Colorado kids don't experience high school football in the same type of pressure cooker environment that you see in other states. They don't do as many camps. They don't do the real competitive 7-on-7 tourneys. They don't study their playbooks year round. They don't have expectations placed on them that they'll be in training during the entire offseason and should avoid long family vacations. They don't play the level of competition where every guy at the 5A level is good enough to at least play at a small college and the backups in their own programs are at least that good and pushing them. They don't play HS games in front of thousands of fans every week. They aren't local and state celebrities. Due to all this, I don't think they're always as prepared for what performing at a BCS level means. Some don't adjust well, either having problems or realizing that they don't love football any more if that's what it is.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
