Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Justice Dept: President Obama's administration may take action on BCS.

  1. #1
    #1 Buff Fan
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bay Area California
    Posts
    16,209

    Justice Dept: President Obama's administration may take action on BCS.



    In the letter to Sen. Orrin Hatch, obtained by The Associated Press, Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich wrote that the Justice Department is reviewing Hatch's request and other materials to determine whether to open an investigation into whether the BCS violates antitrust laws.

    "Importantly, and in addition, the administration also is exploring other options that might be available to address concerns with the college football postseason," Weich wrote, including asking the Federal Trade Commission to review the legality of the BCS under consumer protection laws.

    "The administration shares your belief that the current lack of a college football national championship playoff with respect to the highest division of college football ... raises important questions affecting millions of fans, colleges and universities, players and other interested parties," Weich wrote.
    End the bowl games!!!

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...l?xid=si_ncaaf

  2. #2
    Everyones Favorite A-Hole buff4bcs1985's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    21,635
    Blog Entries
    5
    look im all for bowl games... like an NIT

    Quote Originally Posted by absinthe View Post
    BCS is the voice of reason.
    Sacky's reaction to a text alerting him to Embree's dismissal.
    Quote Originally Posted by sackman
    I will rip your lungs out if this isnt true.

  3. #3
    Club Member BehindEnemyLines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    state of purgatory
    Posts
    9,983
    And lose potential political support from the communities that host the bowl games?

    I'm all for some type of playoff in D1 to determine a true champ. But, imo, any process has to wrap the bowl games into it somehow. The bowl season is a special time of year, and all the hours of hard work, dedication, hopes, and dreams of all teams center around a possible post-season berth somewhere warm and comfy. Ya can't just snap your fingers and make it all go away.
    We should have listened to Colorado fans.

  4. #4
    Resident Commie Bastard 96 Buff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    AllBuffs Politburo
    Posts
    11,194
    Quote Originally Posted by RedDirtBuff View Post
    The bowl season is a special time of year, and all the hours of hard work, dedication, hopes, and dreams of all teams center around a possible post-season berth somewhere warm and comfy.
    Detroit?
    Boise?
    Memphis?
    San Francisco?
    Albuquerque?
    Washington D.C.?
    Charlotte?
    Toronto?
    Dallas?
    Ft. Worth?
    Arlington?

  5. #5
    Moderator Buffnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    41,243
    Blog Entries
    39
    I'd like a playoff. But I damn sure don't want the US Congress & Executive designing the system. Besides, last time I checked we were in the midst of a couple wars and had double-digit unemployment. I'd think they would have something better to do with their time and our money than investigate and legislate how the college football postseason works. Populist B.S. and I'm really surprised that some of you guys seem glad that they're doing this.


    Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. - Alex Levine

  6. #6
    Club Member BehindEnemyLines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    state of purgatory
    Posts
    9,983
    Quote Originally Posted by 96 Buff View Post
    Detroit?......indoors
    Boise?....joke; who the hell wants to play on a blue playground anyway
    Memphis?....weather's generally mild
    San Francisco?....no argument
    Albuquerque?....weather's generally mild
    Washington D.C.?....serious joke
    Charlotte?....don't know enough about the place
    Toronto?....isn't this one also indoors?
    Dallas?....weather's generally mild
    Ft. Worth?....weather's generally mild
    Arlington?....weather's generally mild
    Okay 96, you mentioned 11 of the 497, 325, 187 bowls games. Of those 11, 1 is definitely indoors, 1 might be indoors (im too lazy to look it up), and 5 are in generally mild-weathered locals. That leaves 4 bowl games where parkas are required equipment.

    Still lots to play for, if you're a collegiate athlete.

  7. #7
    Moderator Buffnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    41,243
    Blog Entries
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by RedDirtBuff View Post
    Okay 96, you mentioned 11 of the 497, 325, 187 bowls games. Of those 11, 1 is definitely indoors, 1 might be indoors (im too lazy to look it up), and 5 are in generally mild-weathered locals. That leaves 4 bowl games where parkas are required equipment.

    Still lots to play for, if you're a collegiate athlete.
    It's not just about whether the games's indoors. It's also got to be at a place where a fan of the team may want to spend his time and money in December/January.

  8. #8
    Club Member BehindEnemyLines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    state of purgatory
    Posts
    9,983
    Quote Originally Posted by Buffnik View Post
    It's not just about whether the games's indoors. It's also got to be at a place where a fan of the team may want to spend his time and money in December/January.
    Come on Nik, I'm on a roll.

    Yeah, I get it. Phoenix or Detroit (no contest)? Orlando or Toronto (are we even asking?)? Uh huh, this could go on and on. The fans are gonna like place a better than place b.

    But the fans don't play the game. The teams wanna play somewhere, anywhere, after the season.

  9. #9
    Moderator Buffnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    41,243
    Blog Entries
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by RedDirtBuff View Post
    Come on Nik, I'm on a roll.

    Yeah, I get it. Phoenix or Detroit (no contest)? Orlando or Toronto (are we even asking?)? Uh huh, this could go on and on. The fans are gonna like place a better than place b.

    But the fans don't play the game. The teams wanna play somewhere, anywhere, after the season.
    I agree with you there.

    Even if you've got to play a game no one cares about mid-December in Detroit, you're still getting a killer gift package from the bowl, getting to do some fun events around the game, and getting to play a football game on national tv. Not a bad way to spend a week.


  10. #10
    The Guest
    Guest
    I can't think of anything less important for our federal government to be addressing.

  11. #11
    #1 Buff Fan Mick Ronson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Efrains on 63rd
    Posts
    9,411
    keep the bowls to make everyone happy, 8 team playoff for the NC.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by 96 Buff View Post
    Detroit?
    Boise?
    Memphis?
    San Francisco?
    Albuquerque?
    Washington D.C.?
    Charlotte?
    Toronto?
    Dallas?
    Ft. Worth?
    Arlington?
    What is wrong with giving kids an opportunity to see another part of our great country and for cities to show off their benefits? A playoff could be done without touching a majority of the bowl system. It shouldn't take a congressional investigation.

  13. #13
    #1 Buff Fan
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bay Area California
    Posts
    16,209
    Quote Originally Posted by RedDirtBuff View Post
    And lose potential political support from the communities that host the bowl games?
    .
    Oh, boo-hoo.. Some cities will lose their bowl games.. I'm so outraged..


    Bowl season is a frickin joke with a bunch of useless, unwatchable bowl games with a large amount of them played in half empty stadiums. I can't remember one good bowl game from this last year.


    End the joke Obama!!!

  14. #14
    Club Member BehindEnemyLines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    state of purgatory
    Posts
    9,983
    "And lose potential political support from the communities that host the bowl games?"

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyBuff View Post
    Oh, boo-hoo.. Some cities will lose their bowl games.. I'm so outraged..
    You missed the tongue in cheek part, right?

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
    I can't think of anything less important for our federal government to be addressing.
    Which is exactly why they are doing it. It's a distraction to temporarily take attention away from the screwed up job they are doing in so many other areas.

    It is also a way to send some "feel good" points to Orrin Hatch and the congressional representatives of the MWC/WAC states. When it all comes down nothing will happen.

    Hatch can make a lot of noise and with where he comes from if he doesn't get re-elected whoever replaces him will be a political clone. On the other hand does the administration want to lose ground politically with the SEC/Big X/Big XII representatives where political favor is in play. They can scream all they want but the Bowls make to much money for the BCS and aren't going to go away easily.

    What is funny to me is that the mid-majors are not so much concerned with the bowls as wanting to split up the money evenly even though they don't contribute an even share to the popularity. If somehow this were to pass, I could see a playoff system in which payouts rise by round. With significant money on the line as well as a "championship" the frequency of the mid-majors winning would be very low and I can see them getting a smaller share of the money not a larger share.

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!
SEO Blog

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •