Actually, you can plug either type of player into either type of defense depending on what the philosophy is that is trying to be accomplished. In a Tampa 2 4-3, you do want someone that can run and drop to the apex of the field...but, Matt Russell won the Butkus playing in a different style of 4-3 defense (he obviously fit into that defense). In the 3-4, you have 2 ILB's...often times, you have a bigger body that can take on centers and guards...but the the weak side ILB often can run and chase down plays from the back side.
At least he didn't commit to Boise.
I don't want to be a dick but we had a base 4-3 after '93. The only year Russell played in the 3-4 was '93. Also, I think when you guys are talking about 3-4 D-ends, you are talking about 5 techniques which are really more DT's. Outside LB's in a 3-4 are end types like Alfred and Kanavis. Hell, I lettered at a 5 technique in '93 and you certainly did not want me dropping into coverage. I agree that it is much easier to disguise blitz's in a 3-4 and guys like Greg Brown have to love it from an aggressive pass pressure perspective. I for one, would love to see us go to it. The key to the 3-4 is the Noseguard though. Think Kyle Rapold and Joel Steed!
"Well, no matter how slow a zombie is and how fast you are, they always seem to be able to catch you. The only thing I can figure is they know all the short cuts." - DBT
OL16, welcome to allbuffs. You seem really knowledgeable about Kendall. Is he still a Baylor commit? How solid? Relatives aside.