“Off the top of my head, four years from today, I would not be surprised if the Pac-12 schools saw $12-15 million distribution (each) from the Pac-12 Networks,” Maestas said. “The truth is, it could actually be 30-40 percent higher than that.”
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ich_quick.html
I'm all for it and all, but this is waaaaay too early to project, IMO. I'm sure guys were saying some pretty lofty things about the TLN. Look where that is right now.
I wonder if there is any reason for posting this kind of information...to entice UT to give up on the LHN and join the Pac-12? With the Pac-16, we could be getting $50 million per school from both the Pac-16 Network and TV deals.
The Pac-12 networks already have carriers. The LHN does not. HUGE Difference.Originally Posted by NBDefektor
if the LHN can't gain traction, the Pac-16 could be a reality.
haha. **** your measly 13 mil per year texass.
its fun as hell to say it aint it...
I like a Beaver bearing good news...
Leach: Do you want to fight a buffalo? I don't know, those buffalo are big. You know, buffalo are significantly bigger than elk. I grew up near Yellowstone so I've been near buffalo. Buffalo are huge. And then the other thing I've always gotten a kick out of: When you play Colorado, there's those buffalo dragging those six handler around. Those handlers aren't dragging the buffalo. The buffalo's dragging him.
We dredge up eight-year-old history, and one of Seattle sports' most polarizing figures, only to make a point: That Neuheisel has been left for dead before, and somehow managed to slip out of his bonds and ride triumphantly into the sunset
Last edited by Goose; 02-06-2012 at 02:48 PM. Reason: Edited to remove link.
wtf
Rick's having a baby?
Last edited by Creebuzz; 02-04-2012 at 06:56 PM.
spaaaaaaaam
Right between the eyes!
12-PAC here we come!!
You shut your dirty whore mouth!!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
