Thanks. Incentive for conference tourney seeding goes a long way too.Originally Posted by Buffnik
I think a 5-2 regular season finish with at least one win in the conference tourney puts us in the dance, in my opinion.
Those two wins have to be against two very specific teams. If they are to anybody besides OU and Zona, we are done. We cannot afford to pull another "lose to ****ing ISU" again.
I'm unsure of NCAA invite agreements. Anyone know if there are a set number of automatic PAC 12 bids? I would guess given the conference weakness this year that minimum may be available. So is it 1+ at large?
One automatic bid. Looks like there will only be one at-large as well, and even that is certainly not a given at this point. If a couple teams really kick some ass down the stretch, the Pac might be able to miraculously get 2 at-large.
Thanks. That's what I expected.
I think that we will most likely get two total, unless the top 3 really pull away here down the stretch. If UW, CAL, and CU pull away in a big way and leave little doubt as to who the top three are, then I think we could get 2 at large.
For us that would start with a win at the Zona Zoo on thursday
I think the way we get 3 in is if the 3rd place team wins the tourney.
Hey we are in third place
The game in Tucson is gonna be a tough one. I'd really love to see the Buffs sneak away with a W over the cats, but I'll be happy with a split this week. Keep us in the hunt.
We should have listened to Colorado fans.
Splits are for contenders
Sweeps are for champions.
^This. The Buffs have themselves in position to contend. Now they need to take advantage of the situation, seize control (as much as they can).
"I wasn't too impressed with Lincoln," Parsons said. "I mean, I guess when you compare it to Boulder, not many things compare..."
Well that just got me pumped up. Rep.
as muddled as the 12PAC is this year?
Is Jean Smith still the select committee chair?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
