Reply With QuoteCU comes in 6th in the PAC-12 at 32.
KSU? Ranked 86 with an avg star of 2.15? After last year's success, despite their pathetic situation, I would have thought better...
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&yr=2012
CU comes in 6th in the PAC-12 at 32.
KSU isn't built by recruiting top HS talent. They do their shopping in the Juco's which don't show up in the same way as the HS kids do in the rankings.Originally Posted by DallasBuff
Juco's are also ranked....didn't we land a 4 star Juco WR from Kansas a few years ago?
They are ranked but don't seem to get the same respect in the rankings as HS players do. KSU also in the past has brought in a lot of JUCO kids after the LOI day that don't get figured into the rankings.
This isn't true. For example, look at USC's class of 12 that is ranked #17 on Rivals - two of those are signed JUCO 4 star kids that obviously have a big effect on their ranking.
My enjoyment came from having to go to page 3 to see the nubs at #57
If you're talking about Andre Simmons, and I think you are, thanks for reminding me to turn off the robocall assualt to Independence Community College...
I'm surprised by Washington more than anybody. A program obviously on the rise the last couple years and they have been having good recruiting classes, but at the bottom of the conference right now?
Another example of recruits not caring one bit about new facilities.I'm surprised by Washington more than anybody. A program obviously on the rise the last couple years and they have been having good recruiting classes, but at the bottom of the conference right now?
2012 Goals:
1. Move to Colorado
2. ???
3. Profit
I'm surprised by Washington more than anybody. A program obviously on the rise the last couple years and they have been having good recruiting classes, but at the bottom of the conference right now?
You base that on what again? The guy just fired a bunch of coaches after this year. That's hardly a "rising" program
Going from 0-12 to consecutive bowls in years two and three under Sarkisian is not "on the rise"? Interesting.
I mentioned it a while ago, but Zona and ASU really are feeling the effects of the coaching change. Their classes went to crap.
Oregon State, U-Dub, Utah, and us seem to be the "second tier" in terms of recruiting this season. Not a bad position IMO.
Everybody hates you, Everybody wishes that you were dead
Cuz Peter you suck, Peter you suck
Peter your music is ****ing terrible
Peter you suck, Peter you suck
Peter you don't do anything of value, Peter you suck
Write some music but instead you sit and write these bulls**t songs
It's so self loathing go see a psychiatrist
I hate the psychiatrist
Well go see one anyway
I don't like the psychiatrist
You need to go see one
See a psychiatrist
I'm not going
Iowa St is hurting too. Granted they aren't a power. Though I have to wonder how much the conference realignment talk hurt KSU and Iowa St this fall. Those were the 2 schools most likely to be left out in the rain if the Big 12 imploded.
I'd imagine that any coach going against them is bringing that up as a possibility. "You do understand that if the Big 12 disintegrates Iowa St/Ks St. will most likely drop out of the AQ picture."
What Boulder buff said. 3 or 4 years ago Washington was worse than what we have seen out of the buffs the last 5 years.
Posting Permissions
