Reply With Quote
Vegas has the opening line at -6.5 for CU. Guess all those returning starters don't count for much.
CSewe is clearly a renegade program...where is the outrage? /Ding a ling D'Annabelle impersonation
Vegas has the opening line at -6.5 for CU. Guess all those returning starters don't count for much.
Originally Posted by Goose
I just find them a never ending source of amusement. Having done grad school there and working with a bunch of CSU grads the humor material is never ending. I actually wish them well but for me them doing well would mean going to their natural FCS level. Until then I will enjoy the ongoing delusions of granduer they constantly display.
If Hawkins was so bad as a coach, how come he had no problems beating CSU in his final season 24-3 and CU took the second half off as well? Embree beat CSU last season. How can Sheep fans be hopeful for a win over CU if they can't beat some down CU teams these days?
CU might have fallen on hard times but so has CSU against weaker competition in the MWC and don't forget we actually beat Utah last season which CSU hasn't done since 2005?
Because of this, I can see the end of RMS coming more than ever and that will be due to CSU's lack of ability to compete with CU.
^^^this.
Well, lets see here. Brand new starter at qb, best playmaker at wr out, most of the offensive production from last year gone, youth everywhere, etc... I left things out, I know, but im guessing we wont be huge favorites over anybody, maybe ballsac st? This team has alot of question marks on both sides of the ball, not to mention it'll be one of the youngest teams in the country. All that plus itll be the first game for alot of them and it's against a team where the game is their Super Bowl. Dont get me wrong, its a game we should win but im ok with the spread considering everything.
Back to the title thread. I predict 0-13.
Yes 13 losses because CU's win will be such
a beatdown that it will be counted as two losses for C-S-WHO!
It's feasible.
idk i need to see ICON's work first
CU has a better basketball program. More wins last year, conference championship, a tourney win, and both schools had an 11 seed. CU had the better year, and along with a FAR superior recruiting class and FAR superior attendance and not having to play in a high school gym, CU is the better program. As for volleyball....HAHAHAHAHAHA okay. You take your volleyball program, pretty sure you attend those games better than your basketball games anyway. We'll take our superior football program, superior basketball program, our cross country program that has won multiple NCAA titles (NCAA titles, something your school has ZERO of), a skiing program that is second in the nation in NCAA titles, and a track and field program that won an NCAA title. But volleyball, you're right, can't compete with that.
True, but keep in mind that this is the CSU coaching staff's very first game out of the gates with a rookie head coach (think Hawaii last year). With superior talent, a year in the system, and CSU losing their own best defensive players from an already god awful defense, Colorado should control this game from start to finish. Not saying astronomical blowout, but I'm thinking 2007 38-17 type score.
There is no place like Nebraska...THANK GOD!!!!
"I went to State" could mean a hundred different places. "I went to Colorado" can only mean one.
Well Garrett Grayson is dating a CU student (CSU= fugly girls). Maybe they'll break up before the RMS and she can come post his cell #
I actually think there are some good looking girls at CSU.Well Garrett Grayson is dating a CU student (CSU= fugly girls). Maybe they'll break up before the RMS and she can come post his cell #
Dumb as rocks, but that doesn't matter much.
you make that sound like a bad thing.
Posting Permissions
