AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
'17 CA QB Chase Garbers (Verbal to Cal)
- Thread starter WasianCU
- Start date
That's because he knows Dykes has one foot out the door
I don't follow it closely either, but maybe a back up plan if Lytle decommits?
is there that threat right now beyond the standard "it could happen?"
The bigger threat is the coaches not learning from their mistakes of not having a backup plan.
footballisit
Well-Known Member
He favorited a couple of tweets. People don't realize like Lytle and Garbers these kids develop relationships with coaches. They never offered him, but maybe they will if Lytle does decommit. Garbers also appears to be pretty supportive of Cal.
Having a "back up plan" of an already committed QB to a conference foe seems less like a back up plan and more along the lines of "pull and pray". I feel like big time QB recruiting is a delicate situation for the non blue blood programs.
Who says he's the only piece to this plan? I'd hope that they have best case, base case, and worst case scenarios for this plan.