1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AllBuffs Poll: What is your take on the threatened cancellation of the CSU series?

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by absinthe, Feb 8, 2015.

?

How do you feel about losing the CSU series

Poll closed Feb 13, 2015.
  1. Love the move, end it

    135 vote(s)
    76.7%
  2. Would rather see it continue with changes

    37 vote(s)
    21.0%
  3. Extend it as is

    4 vote(s)
    2.3%
  1. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,890
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Log-on and let us know your thoughts on the news last week about the possible end of the series
     
  2. buff4bcs1985

    buff4bcs1985 Hail to the King

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    26,030
    Likes Received:
    2,142
    you should have made the voting record public so we can ostracize whoever votes wrong...
     
  3. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,890
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    exactly why i didnt
     
  4. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,736
    Likes Received:
    16,435
    I voted the first option. That's my strong preference. I simply don't think the positives outweigh the negatives of playing CSU every year.

    I could bite the bullet on the 2nd option if that meant that we had a CSU game at Folsom in our odd years when we only have 4 Pac-12 home games.

    What CU absolutely cannot live with is playing an annual neutral site game against the Rams.
     
  5. Daaah

    Daaah Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    17,460
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    It's the height of arrogance to say this with CU in its current state, but if CSU was a powerhouse or even regularly ranked, I'd be all for an annual game. However, I'm of the opinion that CSU will revert to what amounts to an average-at-best Mountain West team, and I don't want to be locked into playing a team like that every year. I'm not opposed to occasionally scheduling CSU, but with a limited number of ooc game slots available I don't want CSU in one of them each and every year.
     
  6. jahbrahakala

    jahbrahakala New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    3
    I'd go for a home and home plus a game in Denver every 6 years

    Rotating every two years between the different venues (Folsom, CSU and Mile High "Field")..... Would keep the series from getting stale the Denver game might fill up if we don't play there so often.

    Other way I'd like to go is a home and home very 5 years. Keeps a rivalry going which could rotate with Air Force and Wyoming. The five year hiatus gives a good snapshot of each program's state of being, either you got it or you don't and got to wait till the next series in 5 years.

    It's a good series, Ft Collins is a blast to visit for this, and Denver can be fun if not every year.
     
  7. Quattro

    Quattro Banned BANNED Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    26,503
    Likes Received:
    761
    **** Denver
    **** Fort Collins
    **** CSU
    **** this series
     
  8. Scotch

    Scotch Registered User Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    9,813
    Likes Received:
    431
    The bolded. I don't mind playing them every year, but get it out of Denver, and preferably a 2 or 1 deal. Doesn't matter if the game is in Denver and CSU wins every year, they'll still find a reason to bitch about CU along with the Denver media.
     
  9. Bufffan68

    Bufffan68 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2014
    Messages:
    4,232
    Likes Received:
    755
    I'd keep it but home and home. I think it brings a spotlight to the programs. But I'd be okay if it just went away too.
     
  10. patebuff

    patebuff Downgraded to half a star Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,025
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    If it continues, it has to be a 2 for 1. If not, end it
     
  11. PAHIBuff

    PAHIBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,759
    Likes Received:
    370
    I don't care either way. But don't you want one of your OOC games to be with an MWC, MAC, or AA type (non-P5) team? Well, CSU is one. And honestly, I'm not sure there'd be as much griping about the game if the Buffs were regularly kicking CSU's ass. Tell me that CU is going too make more money playing San Jose State, Connecticut, New Mexico, Bowling Green, or Akron in Boulder as they are playing CSU in Denver. Not sure that's the case, but I'm not an expert in the finances of the Sports Authority contract.
     
  12. InTheBuff

    InTheBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    11,252
    Likes Received:
    507
  13. Bufffan68

    Bufffan68 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2014
    Messages:
    4,232
    Likes Received:
    755
    Great point. We need revenue, so that should help make the decision.
     
  14. aik

    aik Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,868
    Likes Received:
    623
    Do a 2-for-1 once or twice a decade and always guarantee 6 games at Folsom a year, including CSU when we are the home team. No other P5 team would play a G5 team in state with any regularity and not have leverage in these negotiations to stoop to an extended neutral site series or even a home and home. Mike Bohn got worked in this area. You do not see Arkansas State and the Razorbacks agreeing to a decade-long series extension to be played at War Memorial Stadium. There is no debating that we are the only P5 school in a state where this is allowed to happen.
     
  15. DBT

    DBT Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    58,558
    Likes Received:
    4,705
    We should keep it in some form. I'd favor a 2 for 1 or a break every couple of years.
     
  16. pcbuff

    pcbuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    133
    On Friday I supported the series. Seeing the press bash CU for the fully subsidized program in Fort Collins has tuned me. I'm through with this game. Let them schedule whomever they want where ever they want. Ditto for us.
     
  17. zbuff

    zbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,410
    Likes Received:
    712
    Kill it for a few years at least, after this contract expires. Then negotiate on our terms.
     
  18. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,736
    Likes Received:
    16,435
    You guys calling for a 2-for-1 are living in a fantasy land.

    CU just got blasted in the local media for having the nerve to say that it wants to play its home games at Folsom and didn't want to extend the CSU series in consideration of CSU refusing to consider that.

    Yet some of you seem to think that 2 games at Folsom for every 1 game at either CSU or Mile High is somehow on the table. That is simply not an option.

    So get that out of your heads and base your opinions on what is possible.

    What's possible is that CU digs in and holds a firm line that it either gets a game at Folsom in all the odd years for scheduling or that the series goes away. We either support that stance or we don't. There is no third option beyond RG getting so fed up that he takes any further games off the table and refuses to negotiate beyond the current contract even if CSU caves on the remaining dates through 2020 as an offer in exchange for a series extension.
     
  19. Tractor

    Tractor Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    307
    2 for 1. If they don't want to take it, fine. Walk away. Nothing less than 2 for 1.
     
  20. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,522
    Likes Received:
    4,516
    Unless and until college football expands to a 14-game regular season, we can't be in the business of playing any single non conference opponent annually.

    Kill the series. Negotiate for periodic games from time to time on campus.
     
  21. dio

    dio Admin Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    30,122
    Likes Received:
    2,550
    It is a problem with how people understand college sports in this state. It isn't about hating CSU, like some media would like you to believe. It is simply a result of how the football leagues are structured. People around here don't understand that the MWC and Pac-12 are different levels, and that what we've been doing with CU for the past 15 years is HIGHLY unusual. It isn't about CU arrogance. It isn't about how bad CU has been or being scared of CSU. It is about the business logistics around all this. I wish our media around here was better informed of the inner-workings of college athletics.
     
  22. Liver

    Liver modded mod Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    22,871
    Likes Received:
    2,688
    No 2 for 1 then no series. And on campus only.

    And as a part of the b10 and p12 scheduling deal, maybe I'd rotate in a game at invesco with a b10 school every 3-4 years or something. But it would have to be just an occasional thing and hopefully a game with ramifications amongst the p5 teams.
     
  23. CVilleBuff

    CVilleBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    19,527
    Likes Received:
    1,610
    I don't see on-campus as really any better than Denver. 2 for 1 isn't happening and I see zero advantage in playing a road game against a middling MWC program every other year for eternity. We've only got 3 OOC games as it is, perhaps I'd feel differently if we had 4 but even then it's simply not a good scheduling philosophy. CSU is welcome to give us a call if they ever find their way to the big boy conference table. Otherwise, good riddance. I'd rather be getting 2 for 1's against opponents of CSU's stature from Texas and playing home and homes against Iowa, North Carolina, etc.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2015
  24. patebuff

    patebuff Downgraded to half a star Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,025
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    If no 2 for 1, then no game. Simple as that.
     
  25. cu62nu36

    cu62nu36 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    50
    Cancel the series. I'd like to see CU play AF or Wyo or someone else regional once in awhile.
     
  26. Buffalo Brad

    Buffalo Brad Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    8,949
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    The media is so one side in this town that it is just better to end it and take the beating that will come for that move. If CSU decides they want to play us in the future, they will know if will cost them a 2 for1. Just end it now and get the media bs over with.
     
  27. Highlander

    Highlander Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,310
    Likes Received:
    1,561
    I could see a scenario from CUs perspective that we play at home on years of 4 P12 home games, then alternate between Denver and FoCo the alternate years.

    CSU agreeing to this is a whole different conversation.
     
  28. zbuff

    zbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,410
    Likes Received:
    712
    After the series has been cancelled for a few years, CSU backers will clamor for a 2 for 1.
     
  29. WizzersGhost

    WizzersGhost Banned BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    56
    Any 2 for 1 should also be for the second or third game of any given season. This first game, "CSEwe Super Bowl" BS should also stop.
     
  30. CUFan

    CUFan Welcome back Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    470
    Why would we even want a 2 for 1? We want out of this game. CSU should want out of this game. There is no benefit to CU. The only benefit to CSU is $$. Beyond that their entire identity as a team is tied CU. Their on the right path to try and get a P5 invite, they should be trying to redefine the program and develop their own identity. If they keep investing in the program, more $$ will come down the road.

    Cancel the series for a significant length of time (maybe 10 years or so) and then have a 1 for 1. Then don't play again for another 10 years. Would make this game so much more interesting.
     
    jahbrahakala likes this.

Share This Page