1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Analyzing MBB Strength of Schedule (RPI)

Discussion in 'Colorado Basketball Message Board' started by Buffnik, Nov 9, 2015.

  1. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,547
    Likes Received:
    16,174
    Quick Refresher on how RPI is calculated:

    A team's RPI is a sum of three values: 25% of the team's winning percentage, 50% of its opponents' average winning percentage (strength of schedule), and 25% of its opponents' opponents' average winning percentage (opponents' strength of schedule). Only results against teams which are in NCAA Division I are counted in all of these winning percentages.

    Further, all road wins are treated as 1.4 wins, all road losses are treated as 0.6 losses, all home wins are worth 0.6 wins and all home losses are valued at 1.4 losses. Games in neutral sites still counts as 1.

    Minor adjustments (bonus points or penalties) are factored in by the NCAA Selection Committee for scheduling Top 50 opponents, beating them, or -- on the other side -- scheduling too many games (usually over 50%) against below the Top 150 and losing any games to teams outside the Top 150.

    When it comes to Tourney Selection, to get an at-large invite a team needs to be in the Top 70 to have a realistic chance. Last year's lowest Bubble entry was at #65.

    *******************************

    Here is CU's 2015-16 schedule along with each team's 2014-15 RPI (RealTimeRPI):

    11/13/15 -- Iowa State (neutral)... #16 RPI
    11/17/15 -- Auburn (away)... #131
    11/20/15 -- Portland (home)...167
    11/22/15 -- Omaha (home)... 298
    11/25/15 -- Air Force (home)... 248
    11/29/15 -- Northern Colorado (home)... 241
    12/02/15 -- Fort Lewis (home)... n/a
    12/06/15 -- Colorado State (away)... 37
    12/12/15 -- Brigham Young (home)... 44
    12/18/15 -- Nicholls (home)... 322
    12/19/15 -- Hampton (home)... 220
    12/22/15 -- Penn State (neutral)... 116
    12/23/15 -- Kent State or SMU (neutral)... 84 or 18
    01/01/16 -- Cal (away)... 92
    01/03/16 -- Stanford (away)... 33
    01/08/16 -- Utah (home)... 12
    01/13/16 -- Oregon State (home)... 132
    01/17/16 -- Oregon (home)... 26
    01/20/16 -- Washington (away)... 122
    01/23/16 -- Washington State (away)... 162
    01/27/16 -- Stanford (home)... 33
    01/31/16 -- Cal (home)... 92
    02/04/16 -- Oregon (away)... 26
    02/06/16 -- Oregon State (away)... 132
    02/11/16 -- Washington State (home)... 162
    02/13/16 -- Washington (home)... 122
    02/17/16 -- USC (away)... 198
    02/20/16 -- UCLA (away)... 38
    02/24/16 -- Arizona (home)... 4
    02/28/16 -- Arizona State (home)... 87
    03/05/16 -- Utah (away)... 12

    This is very much a middling schedule.

    Only getting UA and UCLA once apiece in the conference schedule may help the Buffs in the Pac-12 standings, but it does no favors to the RPI.

    Biggest thing is that the non-conference gives the opportunity for six potential games against the Top 100 with likely 3 or 4 against the Top 50. Buffs absolutely must get some wins out of those chances.

    I don't know what to make of the Pac-12, though. Conference is relying on a lot of newcomers this year and it could go either way. There's a great opportunity for the Buffs with the advantageous schedule and one of the more veteran teams.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2015
    SlatsGrobnik, Tractor and Goose like this.
  2. GoBuffs88

    GoBuffs88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    33
    Better hope Arizona, Cal, and Utah look good in OOC to keep our conference RPI high.
     
  3. GoonieBuff

    GoonieBuff Not really Club Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,546
    Likes Received:
    322
    On the plus side for RPI, it's good that we only face USC once.
     
  4. BuffG

    BuffG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Really counting on CAL & OSU being top 50 teams this yr. Also need SMU to maintain w/o Larry in OOC.
    I think it's safe to say there will be more top 50 P12 teams this year than last.
    Either way, I complained a lot about last year's OOC so I can't praise the staff enough for putting a good one together.
     
  5. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,547
    Likes Received:
    16,174
    I don't think the Buffs can afford to drop more than 2 games in the OOC without putting themselves behind the Bubble 8-ball heading into conference play.
     
  6. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    56,883
    Likes Received:
    4,911
    No margin for error at all. Yikes
     
  7. jgisland

    jgisland Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    471
    Scheduling is so tough, I don't know how they do it. This OOC schedule is terrible, they can't afford losses against this garbage. But if you schedule hard and lose, is that any better (RPI wise probably yes) but does that kill the soul of your team for conference play?
     
  8. CVilleBuff

    CVilleBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    19,520
    Likes Received:
    1,600
    Pac is a bit mysterious, but this isn't a schedule tailored for an at-large bid unless CU is ready to take multiple top notch conference scalps/ win road games against decent squads flirting with the top 50. I'm fine with it as getting beaten down with a brutal OOC isn't what this program needs right now. I could see the OOC being a bit tougher than we think, but it won't have a huge effect.
     

Share This Page