What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Athletics Subsidies - CU at 15%

Took me a second to realize what I was looking at. Closer you are to 0%, the better off you are.
 
Interesting stuff. I think you are on to something in regards to the coaching buyouts. Also the cost of the conference switch could factor in.

Accounting for college athletic programs is also a really squishy subject. Schools can make a profit look like a loss or a loss look like breaking even. This article talks about "subsidies" but the nature of those subsisdies can vary greatly. In some cases it means money from the university general fund going to cover direct AD expenses, in others certain fundraising and publicity expenses for the entire school are "billed" to the AD meaning in effect the AD is subsidizing the general school.

They also include as a subsidy the fees and assessments from students. In many of these cases the students are recieving free or greatly reduced prices for admission to athletic and other university events, very different than taking money out of the history department to cover the football coaches private jet.

It also doesn't account for things like the CU AD being assessed out of state tuition for all athletes regardless of their residency status. In this case the university recieves the state benefit from this student and still takes the money from the AD at the higher rate.

I do wonder how a lot of the schools, especially those in non-AQ conferences can continue to participate in BCS level football with their athletic departments taking over $10 million a year in subsidies. The cost of doing business is going to continue to go up and I don't see anyone lining up to give the MWC, the WAC, the MAC or the Sun Belt substantially higher TV contracts. Even if they were to double their TV revenue CSU would still only be getting about $3 million a year, far short of their deficit.
 
Back
Top