1. A new Club member feature has been added. If you wish to ignore a thread or forum please see this thread.. If you are not a club member, but would like this feature please consider becoming a member here

Cal approves $321 million stadium renovation

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by Buffnik, Jan 21, 2010.


  1. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    64,474
    Likes Received:
    2,529
    SAN FRANCISCO -- The University of California has approved a $321 million renovation of UC Berkeley's Memorial Stadium.

    The UC Board of Regents signed off on the renovation and seismic retrofit of UC Berkeley's 87-year-old Memorial Stadium, which straddles the Hayward Fault. The project will reduce seating from about 72,000 to 63,000 and upgrade restrooms, food service and public safety facilities.

    The project is expected to begin later this year and be completed by the start of the 2012 football season. The stadium will be closed during Cal's 2011 season, when the team will play at another location.

    UC officials say the project will be funded mainly by sales of long-term rights to about 3,000 stadium seats and that no state money will be used.

    Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press

    *************

    Very interesting. This looks to me like they're spending $300 MM in order to make less money. That stadium is a dump and needs to be fixed, but they're losing 9k seats and sacrificing the 2011 home slate. Plus, you'd have to think that if people paid $50k+ per seat for long-term rights on 3k premium seats then they're not paying the regular ticket price for those seats going forward.

    I hope Bohn studies this in depth and learns something valuable from it. CU is going to need to look at a Folsom, Dal Ward & Balch project at some point in the near future. The Cal plan may offer some ideas since they pulled it off without using state money, but I'm skeptical that it's the exact right model.
     
  2. Coloradosker

    Coloradosker Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    27
    Tedford better start doing something with that team to justify this. 5 more years of shattered expectations and Emerald Bowls and those fans are going to stop buying tickets.
     
  3. JimmyBuff

    JimmyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,877
    Likes Received:
    225
    what's the big deal.. they play their 2011 schedule at Oakland Alameda Coliseum. They'll probably outdraw the Raiders.. :lol:


    Disagree on Tedford.. They haven't gotten over the hump, but that program is in so much better shape than before. Tedford is a good coach..
     
  4. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    43,041
    Likes Received:
    1,246
    This sounds remarkably like what Stanford did a few years ago. They went from a 85K seat stadium +/- to around 55K ( I don't know the exact figures, somebody can feel free to correct me) but made the stadium much nicer.
     
  5. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,077
    Likes Received:
    685
    you are right, although somehow it only cost Stanford about 1/3rd of the Cal price.
     
  6. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    43,041
    Likes Received:
    1,246
    $321MM is a ton of money, no doubt about it. I shudder to think what CU could do with $321MM.
     
  7. KingPants

    KingPants Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,309
    Likes Received:
    69
    Has to be location. Cal's stadium is on a fault, and on a hill, might make it a little more expensive. Plus they probably have to pay the tree people to move during the construction.
     
  8. Daaah

    Daaah Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,128
    Likes Received:
    495
    What sucks is that this is going to make Tightwad Hill a thing of the past. It's really a great place to watch a game. And it's free!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  9. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    17,844
    Likes Received:
    203
    I think it was similar to the LA Coliseum before they lowered the field in that it had a track and had a pretty flat slope. It almost looks like they completely rebuilt it because not only is the track gone but it now has an upper deck. And I'm pretty sure they rarely ever had a capacity or near-capacity crowd anyway, so it's not like they lost much if anything by giving up that many seats. I guess having 85K seats (or whatever it was) helped in getting them a Super Bowl played there. :huh:
     
  10. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    43,041
    Likes Received:
    1,246
    I was in that old stadium. It was a relic from a bygone era. Huge stadium.
     
  11. sweaty teets

    sweaty teets Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,241
    Likes Received:
    614
    apparently a large chunk of the money is for a retrofit. they are gunna separate the stadium in sections and lay a bunch of plastic below it so it will "move" with the earthquakes.
     
  12. Skidmark

    Skidmark Flagship of the 12-Pac Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    22,520
    Likes Received:
    2,110
    Can't wait to check out the stadium before they close it down. Next season can't start soon enough.
     
  13. OKCBuff

    OKCBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,547
    Likes Received:
    48
    Exactly. Plus, it's typically easier to just tear something down and rebuild it, which is what Stanford did.
     
  14. SINKRATZ

    SINKRATZ Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    217
    Stanford did the whole thing in a single offseason too which is pretty incredible. The old stadium was a terrible place to watch a game especially with the track around the field.
     
  15. Nor Cal Buff

    Nor Cal Buff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    21
    The furds' old stadium sure did suck. Haven't been to the new one yet, but have heard good things.

    Pretty much all stadiums with tracks suck. The only stadium I can think of that doesn't is Husky Stadium, which would be absolutely amazing if it got rid of the track somehow.
     
  16. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    43,041
    Likes Received:
    1,246
    The way you get rid of a track is to lower the level of the field and expand the seats inward.
     
  17. SINKRATZ

    SINKRATZ Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    217
    In most places maybe, but tough to do in the bay area without some heavy duty waterproofing. Pretty sure Stanford would have run into the water table going that far down.
     

Share This Page