Discussion in 'Colorado Basketball Message Board' started by whatthebuff, Mar 14, 2011.
I know, time to move on. But Seriously what the ****.
This doesent bother me nearly as much as the fact that Clemson and UAB didint have a single win against the RPI top 50. At least U$C had 5. Another interesting comparison is CU vs Michigain. The two have very similar profiles but I guess playing KU and Syracuse in out of conf (and losing both games) is the difference between being an 8 seed in the tourney and being in the NIT.
It bothers me from the inconsistent criteria standpoint. USC's selection points to quality wins and finishing strong being the most important factors. However, other selections point to other factors being more important. This is why I keep saying that not choosing CU could not have been an objective decision.
Separate names with a comma.