1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Current tweets point to Big 12-2 being saved

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by OKCBuff, Jun 14, 2010.

  1. OKCBuff

    OKCBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,547
    Likes Received:
    48
    Unreal. Follow @ChipBrownOB, @ChrisLevel, @gkketch, @cbsdollarbill, @PeteThamelNYT to see what I've been seeing.
     
  2. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,974
    Likes Received:
    2,673
    Not surprised at all. I along with others here, have been speculating UT wasn't going any where. They like being king of the hill, even if the hill is dung. If they went Pac 10 or B10 they are no longer the big fish, (i.e. USC, UM, tOSU). The B12 will be "saved". Everyone will line up for Bevo to service them as a price of the fealty to the Horns. I'm glad CU got out....
     
  3. GoldenBuff

    GoldenBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    315
    What I don't understand about this whole "Beebee Plan" business is how a TV deal could be renegotiated now when the Big 12 has years remaining on their current contract. If you're a network (and I know this has been discussed to some extent already), why would you want to pay more money for less product. The Big 12 is now down to 10 and can't play a championship game. I just don't see how Beebee could pull all of these additional millions of dollars out of his ass to entice the rest of the Big 12 south to stay. Anyone seeing anything I'm not?
     
  4. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    More like them servicing Bevo.

     
  5. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,495
    Likes Received:
    4,494
    If so, the Big 12 is on life support. It won't last another 5 years without UT giving up a ton of power and influence - and money. You have at least three, if not 6 of the remaining teams that are seriously looking at greener pastures. Once the opportunity presents itself for Mizzou, OU, and A&M to leave, they'll be out in a New York Minute.
     
  6. Razorbuff

    Razorbuff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    11
    I agree with this. The Big 12 has lost CU and Nebraska, both of which make up most of the market share in the North. They are also probably going to lose A&M as well. Three of the bigger schools... how do they magically get more money out of that? Also, what network is going to pay that type of money to broadcast Big 12 games when as I stated earlier three of the bigger schools will be gone? I think Texas might be able to pull $15-$17 million for itself, the rest of the conference no way in hell.
     
  7. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,974
    Likes Received:
    2,673
    No, IMO, Beebe is nothing more than DeLoss Dodds cabana boy. Unless, they renegotiate with the networks for an extension, I'm not sure anything changes. I don't see how fewer TV's will be more $$$$, although there might be some marginal increase because of a ten way split instead of a 12 way. UT wanted to keep the B12 intact and was likely ready to withstand two or maybe even three defections. They like their little kingdom and weren't about to let it go. If more than three teams had bailed, they may have seriously looked at another conference, but short of that, they like having the B12 N as their whipping boys. With Leach gone, only aTm and OU really give them a game. And aTm just barely.
     
  8. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,495
    Likes Received:
    4,494
    I think what they should do is add TCU and Houston and re-name it the "Southwest Conference." The new iteration of the SWC will be doomed to failure, just as the original was. But at least the hats in Austin can pat themselves on the back for being heroes for a few years.
     
  9. Junction

    Junction Moderator Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,534
    Likes Received:
    1,000,005
    The only way I see those numbers working is if they're counting on splitting a lot of $$$ from the exit penalties of the other schools...
     
  10. chipwich

    chipwich Administrator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    20,687
    Likes Received:
    1,657
    Please let this be true. Add Utah and be done with it for now.

    When the Big 12 lite folds in a few yeas the PAC can poach some teams if the opportunity arises.
     
  11. GoldenBuff

    GoldenBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    315
    Chip Brown usually starts his tidbits with "A Big 12 AD told me...". Anyone care to guess who that AD might be? Yeah. I thought so.
     
  12. Razorbuff

    Razorbuff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    11
    What's the exit penalty going to be? $20 million total? Split 9 or 10 ways? Ok, that's roughly $2 million per school for one year. No way in hell that TV contract could possibly be done is what I'm saying.
     
  13. Lt.Col.FrankSlade

    Lt.Col.FrankSlade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,553
    Likes Received:
    207
    Texas is willing to listen because the Big 12 is offering to let UT create its own television network and also willing to let UT keep all the revenue from such a network.

    OU is apparently looking to create a similar network.
     
  14. Swish

    Swish Half a bubble off Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    551
    No need for a conference championship.....just crown the whorns champ when the year begins, the old north division will not be any competition for them
    The Sooners have already demonstrated their subservience through this process "All kneel before Bevo"

    Rename the conference "The Stroke Bevo's Ego 10"
    The materialistic in me says; "too bad, nice to have had Texas money"
    The pragmatic in me says; "Continued cooperation just comes at too high a price"

    Be interesting to see if five years down the road the whorns start getting spanked in bowl games because of very little real competition in the conference. Why does anyone think these SEC teams are so dang tough - week in week out they are often tested to the limit during conference play.

    At least the Baylor Boors will be placated
     
  15. OKCBuff

    OKCBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,547
    Likes Received:
    48
    Looks like we get our wish! Add Utah and leave UT. Things are falling apart!
     
  16. Lt.Col.FrankSlade

    Lt.Col.FrankSlade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,553
    Likes Received:
    207
    Re: exit fees ---


    3.1
    Membership. Each Member Institution shall remain a member of the Conference
    until July 1, 2006 (the “Current Term”) and during any Additional Term (as defined
    below). Unless a Member Institution gives written notice that it will withdraw from
    the Conference at the end of the Current Term or the then-current Additional Term to
    all other Member Institutions and the Conference (a “Notice”) not less than two (2)
    years before the end of the Current Term or the then-current Additional Term, as the
    case may be, each Member Institution shall remain a member of the Conference for
    an additional five-year period after the end of the Current Term or the then-current
    Additional Term, as the case may be (each, an “Additional Term”) unless such member is a Breaching Member. Each Member Institution agrees that in the event such Member desires to withdraw from the Conference, that it will in good faith give Notice not less than two (2) years before the end of the Current Term or any Additional Term, as the case may be. No Member Institution shall be entitled to distribution of the then-current revenues from the Conference after the effective date of its withdrawal, resignation, or the cessation of its participation in the Conference (the “Effective Date”).

    3.2

    Effect of Giving Notice. If a Member Institution gives proper Notice pursuant to Section 3.1 (a “Withdrawing Member”), then the Members agree that such withdrawal would cause financial hardship to the remaining Member Institutions of the Conference, and that the financial consequences cannot be measured or estimated with certainty at this time. Therefore, in recognition of the obligations and responsibilities of each Member Institution to all other Member Institutions of the Conference, each Member Institution agrees that the amount of revenue that would have been otherwise distributable to a Withdrawing Member pursuant to Section 2 herein for the final two (2) years of the Current Term or the then current Additional Term, as the case may be, shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%), with
    the remainder to be distributed to the other Member Institutions who are not Withdrawing Members or Breaching Members (as defined below) as additional Conference revenues in accordance with Section 2 herein. The Member Institutions agree that such reduction in the amount of revenues distributed to a Withdrawing Member is reasonable and shall be in the form of liquidated damages and not be construed as a penalty.


    The Big 12 conference distributed $103.1 million (in 2007/2008 - the latest numbers available). Colorado received $8.0 million of that.

    If Colorado gave proper notice, they would have to forfeit half of their conference money. Based upon the 2007/2008 figures that would be approximately $4 million.
     

Share This Page