1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Do you agree with Tad's first half foul policy?

Discussion in 'Colorado Basketball Message Board' started by Buffnik, Jan 21, 2012.

?

Should Tad sit players in the 1st half once they have 2 fouls?

  1. Yes. Got to be full strength for the 2nd half.

    15 vote(s)
    35.7%
  2. No. Got to play it situationally and can't risk giving up late 1st half runs.

    6 vote(s)
    14.3%
  3. All I know is that you don't question Tad ****ing Boyle!

    21 vote(s)
    50.0%
  1. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,644
    Likes Received:
    16,306
    He's going by the old John Chaney Temple philosophy that a player sits for the rest of the 1st half as soon as he picks up his 2nd foul. I don't know if Tad's as inflexible with this policy as Chaney was, but he seems to be following it to the letter. Dre sat a long time tonight and this isn't the first time that this has happened (Austin, Dre in other games and Spencer come to mind).

    Do you like this policy?
     
  2. Nor Cal Buff

    Nor Cal Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    65
    Don't like it at all. Last I checked, points count the same whether they are scored in the first minute of the game or last minute of the game. By benching a player for having too many fouls, you are unnecessarily limiting his production and thus the production of the team. I'd rather have a star player play 20 minutes and foul out 5 minutes into the second half than only play 15 minutes but be in there for the last couple minutes, particularly when the guy is not a great free throw shooter (this is general-speak, I know Dre played 25 minutes tonight). Also, note that Dre only ended up with 3 fouls, something that often happens when players get in early foul trouble. Basically I'm against benching a player for being in foul trouble in pretty much any situation, unless he is being benched for the fouls being part of a larger problem with the player's play in a particular game or is playing scared because of the fouls and letting in easy buckets.
     
  3. L Buff

    L Buff Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,881
    Likes Received:
    1,353
    Yes.

    Why?

    #1 - Allowing your best players (especially defensive/rebounding players) to play with a little more abandon in the second half because they're not in immediate foul trouble is a good thing.

    #2 - There really is no number two ... I believe that Tad Boyle may be the best thing that's happened to CU sports since Bill McCartney ... and it took him four frickin years to actually show some sucess.

    So ... lighten up Francis. :nod:
     
  4. Nor Cal Buff

    Nor Cal Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    65
    Why not tell them to play with that same abandon in the first half? It all counts the same in the end. Love Tad and think he's doing great things here but just like any coach, there are things he can do better IMO.
     
  5. RumblinBuff

    RumblinBuff That one blogging guy Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    241
    Do points count the same in the first and second halves? Absolutely. However, even a stat guy will tell you that higher-leverage possessions tend to exist in the second frame. You get two fouls, you sit. It's sound basketball.

    If 'Dre had picked up a Pac-12, bull**** 3rd foul late in the first, we wouldn't have seen him til the 15-12 minute mark in the 2nd half. His defense out of the gate after intermission was key.

    Also, never question Coach Boyle. #RollTad
     
  6. BehindEnemyLines

    BehindEnemyLines beware the habu Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages:
    14,578
    Likes Received:
    916
    Yes, I agree with sitting a player for a period of time after getting a 2nd first-half foul. I don't know if riding the pine until halftime is always the right thing to do, but you have to get the player off the court so they don't pick up #3.
     
  7. Nor Cal Buff

    Nor Cal Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    65
    IMO the value of those higher leverage situations is overrated. Playing a guy 5 less minutes than he should get is worth quite a bit more than the tiny extra value of those possessions. You might be able to argue that a guy who is a great free throw shooter will be worth enough to make up for that at the end (both due to end-game fouling and also because they can get to the line on non-shooting fouls once you're in the bonus) or a guy who is a great 3 point shooter can be worth more if you're behind and need 3s to catch up, but Dre doesn't fit either of those descriptions.

    With regards to your second paragraph, I disagree with sitting him in that situation too.
     
  8. L Buff

    L Buff Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,881
    Likes Received:
    1,353
    You know what's great? CU basketball is relevant again. We can agree or disagree about the finer points ... but the fact is that several of us actually care about the state of the program. I'm not sure that was the situation three or four years ago.


    In short .. GO BUFFS!!! :thumbsup:
     
  9. CVilleBuff

    CVilleBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    19,524
    Likes Received:
    1,610
    You obviously sit the guy at first, but you can't let a tie game when the player goes out with 4 minutes left in the 1st half turn into a 12 point deficit at halftime. There are certainly situations out there where you need to take the risk and put them in for the last couple minutes of a half.
     
  10. Nor Cal Buff

    Nor Cal Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    65
    It's nice. Our two remaining Saturday home games are against the two teams that we trail by 1/2 a game in the conference so they're going to be important and hopefully we can sell out the Foam Dome for those two games.
     
  11. RK

    RK UBL Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,920
    Likes Received:
    474
    If you can avoid falling too far behind without a key player than its completely worth it. I guarantee that Tad had an eye on the rebounding numbers and the score obviously and if either started to get out of hand I think he would've put Dre back in. But Andre's D in the second half made the difference in the game and if he would've gotten a 3rd in the first half theres a good chance we wouldn't have seen him down the stretch. Don't EVER question Tad Boyle.
     
  12. Mick Ronson

    Mick Ronson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    9,868
    Likes Received:
    271
    i like that he has a principle. i think with as few fouls we have to give in the paint...or how we struggle to score the rock from the perimeter at times.....i might be more "situational". but, last time i checked....no one was paying me to coach basketball.
     
  13. jgisland

    jgisland Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    471
    This is completely a situational decision and Tad made the right call with Dre and this team. If Simba was playing at a higher level or if Cain was still on this team you may give Dre a little leeway and hope he doesn't pick up that 3rd foul knowing you had other options. But that isn't reality with this team, Dre is needed out there in the 2nd half, there just isn't that front court depth (even though Dre is a guard :huh:) for Dre not to be in there during crunch time.
     
  14. SECOBuffsFan

    SECOBuffsFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    37
    Its a good philosophy as long as you don't become stubborn with it...protects you defensively in the second half.

    If you have a chance to get way behind in the first half and the player with 2 fouls is the key to keeping it close, you have to gamble. But, I think you are more willing to gamble going for a conference title later in the year or in the conference tournament than you are in the middle of the conference season.
     
  15. btbuff

    btbuff It's an inside joke Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,751
    Likes Received:
    69
    Everything should be situational.
    I know there is a lot of commentary in the NBA revolving around this topic and Bynum. Recently teams have done everything they can to get Bynum to pick up two early fouls knowing that Mike Brown will sit him. He changes the game and when he goes out all offense has to flow through Bryant. Many would argue he should stay in, because it changes how they Lakers play. No one really cares to see Metta play the outside game, or bumble around in the paint. It just isn't effective.

    You see Stan Van Gundy operating a different philosophy with Dwight. When Dwight gets into Foul trouble, he is too important to the team. He is taken out, but he comes back in if the team isn't operating very well or if they need to stop the bleeding.

    Both these situations revolve around the offensive side of the ball. Dre is important to us on offense, but is he Dwight Howard important? I would argue with the way Austin has been playing he is not. Tad has been using him in the second half because of his importance to us on the defense in the second half.

    So, basically I support Tad's decision. Dre needs to make his impact defensively in the second half when our offense dies.
     
  16. jgisland

    jgisland Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    471
    Roy Williams pulled Harrison Barnes tonight when he picked up his 2nd foul with 10 mins left in the first half. It was fairly close at the time, with UNC leading by 12ish with 6:30 left in the half he put him back in.

    Clearly Roy doesn't have a hard and fast rule, but according to thebasketballdistribution.com UNC has the 11th best starting 5 and a pretty decent bench to fall back on. Obviously there are a lot of factors that go into this, Barnes isn't having a first team all-american year like was projected, but he isn't a guy you want on the bench in crunch time.
     

Share This Page