Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by SanDiegoBuff, Nov 19, 2009.
I wonder if guys like Fowler can donate to the CU Fund since it's not the AD and a conflict of interest. He may know something. I'd heard he's a significant donor and he gives to the school of journalism.
Regardless of popular opinion, he bleeds black and gold, I'd be surprised if he didn't know something.
He kind of stuttered through it like he realized he was saying too much and then quickly changed the subject.
He knows other boosters that have the cash to make it happen
If you guys can't come up with a couple mil to get a coach then you don't take your football seriously enough.
I don't think people realize the difficulty that exists to win in a place like Colorado.
Sounds like he spent too much time talking to Hawk about "excuses".
ISU called. They want CU to keep their coach so they can get an easy win for a bowl every year.
I have to agree with this.
Yeah I read what Bama said and shrugged and thought to myself that was a pretty accurate statement
yeah that was weak. You know the players have to go to class?? Not Stanford though.
Yeah what a tool.. Now I guess its easy to win at Cincy, Stanford, Oregon State, TCU, Kansas, etc.
He just said it again as they were signing off..."...the money is there to buy him out" was basically what he said...
Yeah, and throw in some money for the officials like, you know, the LSU game...
Not basically what he said, that is what he said.
yeah i think fowler know's were geting a new coach he stated a few time's win lose colume.
God I hope so.
He also added that he "would be surprised if a buy out did not occur."
You have 15 less scholies to work with now than mac did. You have higher than average enrollment standards and less fertile recruiting grounds. You have less total practice time and harder classes and standards for student athletes. And an administration that puts academics above all else.
The 1990s are very far in the rear view mirror.
dont say that. i want the 90s back
Hawkins does not even use all of his available scholarships.
I actually believe the scholly limits help CU. OU, Texas and other teams can not load up like they use to. CU has to get back into texas big time.
I do too. And Im glad I lived it from 90 to 94. But after the embarrassment the scandal caused the only way for management to control the situation is limit who gets in and who doesnt. I think we can find a coach more adept at winning 5 to 6 game or more for year but Im doubtful we'll ever see 10 win seasons on a regular basis again.
This is correct.
i am glad i lived it too. i however was in highschool in omaha getting **** every day for being a die hard buff and didnt realize how great we were and how much i would long for 9 10 win seasons.
He's a ****ing prima donna sell out.
roll your eyes all you want. What has he done for CU? What? When? Where? Just want to know.
With the right guy we could be a lot better with what we have, what we can get. The reduction certainly exposes more clearly who can coach and who cant cause you've got to make the talent you get develop or your hosed. I think the admissions window is a big problem.
What has westbrook,salaam, stewart, and other alums done? Fowler gives back to cu I'm pretty sure. He wants cu to win, if he would have said they should keep hawk you would have said what a great alum he is.
Separate names with a comma.