10 x 9 = 90
12 x 9 = 108
???????????
Edit: Then you divide by 2 because 2 teams are playing each game. I've got it now.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
FOX pays $25 million for Pac-12 Championship Game
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
10 x 9 = 90
12 x 9 = 108
???????????
Edit: Then you divide by 2 because 2 teams are playing each game. I've got it now.
Does anybody know if Ron Franklin is available?
2 teams in each game, so it only takes 45 or 54 games to get all those games played...
Is he? He would be perfect, but unfortunately I think he works for ESPN.
Don't worry, Sweet Cheeks, you'll find it.
i heard he got fired
I hear he's homeless & roaming the streets of San Diego. I think that's the same guy...?
[video=youtube;Ag8g96qsdaI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag8g96qsdaI[/video]
You're thinking of Ron Burgundy, but he found his dog and is back at work now. All is good.
Ron Franklin, on the other hand, remains unemployed, but rumors have it that he's on Fox's short list for their Pac 12 games.
Anyone know what the Big 12 champ rights are/were worth by comparison?
Idot Buff
Guest
Nope...Ron and Ben Wright are now roomates down in North Carolina, sitting around the campfire bashing chicks....
They don't have a championship game anymore!!! :lol:
CU827
Well-Known Member
If they still did would Ron Franklin be available to announce the game?
Hey Farva, what's the name of that place you like to go to?....
Ron Franklins Sweet Cheeks Donut Hut
ScottyBuff
Well-Known Member
Official Pac-12 wording is that the "other inventory" is:
So, Fox (the main channel) gets the CCG, while FSN gets the added inventory of football/MBB games from Colorado/Utah joining.
Basically it is the same TV access that CU already had under the FSN with the Big 12, just now through the Pac-12.
For 2011 the Pac-12 football rights will go as follow:
1) ABC/ESPN has rights to 20 games per season. They have "first choice" of games.
2) FSN has rights to 24 games now (18 previously, added 6 with the new deal). 5 games have been sublicensed to Versus, 13 windows for games on FSN. No details on the "sublicensing" impact of the added 6 games (whether they are "kept" on FSN or not). Presumably they would keep a good portion of those games.
3) Fox Sports airs the Football Championship Game.
The only portions that CU gets Pac-12 revenue sharing from is the added $14.5 million for the CCG, and whatever portion of the added revenues are attributed to them for the 2011 FSN contract. The Pac currently operates under a revenue sharing agreement that pays 60% of the revenue to teams that get TV games, it is uncertain how many of the 6 added games will be CU games at this time.
The question that I have is the "other" $10.5 million of the $25 million deal that was announced. It was stated that it was "part of a prior contractual obligation" so not sure exactly what that means. It could be an "extension" of the pricing the league got from their previous FSN deal (as in: the prior deal with 10 teams for 18 games was valued at around $1MM per game per year, so we'll bump that to $1.25 for football and $300k for each men's BB game for the added inventory). If that is the case, then there is a better chance that CU will see a greater share of this money in 2011-12.
So, Fox (the main channel) gets the CCG, while FSN gets the added inventory of football/MBB games from Colorado/Utah joining.
Basically it is the same TV access that CU already had under the FSN with the Big 12, just now through the Pac-12.
For 2011 the Pac-12 football rights will go as follow:
1) ABC/ESPN has rights to 20 games per season. They have "first choice" of games.
2) FSN has rights to 24 games now (18 previously, added 6 with the new deal). 5 games have been sublicensed to Versus, 13 windows for games on FSN. No details on the "sublicensing" impact of the added 6 games (whether they are "kept" on FSN or not). Presumably they would keep a good portion of those games.
3) Fox Sports airs the Football Championship Game.
The only portions that CU gets Pac-12 revenue sharing from is the added $14.5 million for the CCG, and whatever portion of the added revenues are attributed to them for the 2011 FSN contract. The Pac currently operates under a revenue sharing agreement that pays 60% of the revenue to teams that get TV games, it is uncertain how many of the 6 added games will be CU games at this time.
The question that I have is the "other" $10.5 million of the $25 million deal that was announced. It was stated that it was "part of a prior contractual obligation" so not sure exactly what that means. It could be an "extension" of the pricing the league got from their previous FSN deal (as in: the prior deal with 10 teams for 18 games was valued at around $1MM per game per year, so we'll bump that to $1.25 for football and $300k for each men's BB game for the added inventory). If that is the case, then there is a better chance that CU will see a greater share of this money in 2011-12.
CU827
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
That place is good, but don't eat the doughnut holes!
why they are personally tounge punched by ron franklin
You said RF!
[video=youtube;nbgOQf4NaG8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nbgOQf4NaG8[/video]
Some asshole. Do you know if he's available to do the Pac-12 championship?
Attachments
2 mil is nice but fox? Fox sucks in everyway possible. As someone mentioned earlier, keep there awful NFL broadcasters away.
The Pac 12 needs to get espn on board.
Also, fox sports is no longer on direct tv since that channel has been taken down due to conflicts.
The Pac 12 needs to get espn on board.
Also, fox sports is no longer on direct tv since that channel has been taken down due to conflicts.
as of right now this is only for 2011
Got it, and I meant FOX channel not fox sports, I have 500 hundred of those.....
I know that everyone here can't wait to watch the cotten bowl on fox tonight.
ScottyBuff
Well-Known Member
Fox Sports (the national channel) is making a much bigger push for college athletics and football in particular. It sounds like they are really trying to cut into ESPN's hold and I'm sure that means they are going to have dedicated college announcers.
They own the Big Ten and Pac-12 championship games on the same weekend. ESPN only has the ACC, while CBS has the SEC. FSN owns the Conference USA game as well, along with their all-sports deal. Currently they also hold secondary rights deals with the Pac-10 and Big 12 through FSN.
They bid up the ACC all-sports rights this past summer, and are expected to be a major player for the Pac-12 future rights.
Commissioner Scott also would not let them just own the rights for the highest price, he would demand quality production and delivery because he knows how important it is to have a quality product aired on TV.
They own the Big Ten and Pac-12 championship games on the same weekend. ESPN only has the ACC, while CBS has the SEC. FSN owns the Conference USA game as well, along with their all-sports deal. Currently they also hold secondary rights deals with the Pac-10 and Big 12 through FSN.
They bid up the ACC all-sports rights this past summer, and are expected to be a major player for the Pac-12 future rights.
Commissioner Scott also would not let them just own the rights for the highest price, he would demand quality production and delivery because he knows how important it is to have a quality product aired on TV.