1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How do you grade this CU class?

Discussion in 'University of Colorado Recruiting Archive' started by Buffnik, Feb 3, 2010.

?

What grade do you give this CU recruiting class?

  1. A

    1 vote(s)
    1.0%
  2. B

    3 vote(s)
    3.1%
  3. C

    36 vote(s)
    37.5%
  4. D

    39 vote(s)
    40.6%
  5. F

    10 vote(s)
    10.4%
  6. Incomplete

    7 vote(s)
    7.3%
  1. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,549
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Please take the time to explain the grade you give with a post. Should be very interesting.
     
  2. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,630
    Likes Received:
    4,610
    D-

    Really feel like the staff neglected the defensive side of the ball. Every level of the defense has holes that were not addressed, especially DT and CB.
     
  3. buffsyko

    buffsyko Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    10,658
    Likes Received:
    303
    I would give it a D+

    Staring off the qb hirschman, bell, mobley and the 2 de's have some good potential but with the risks with grades, injuries and 'projects" along with the offers , it's hard to grade any hire. No DT's really drops the grade,especially with the news of bonsu.
     
  4. Junction

    Junction Moderator Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,534
    Likes Received:
    1,000,005
    D

    C is average. This class doesn't rate that high.
    F is failure. You can't say it's a complete failure at this point.

    Therefore, it's a D. Below average, but not a total failure.
     
  5. JimmyBuff

    JimmyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,901
    Likes Received:
    227
    F.. The class is embarrassing low in big time prospects.. Its nice to have a few under the radar players or sleepers but not over 75% of the whole class.. Getting no one in the Top 10 of the state of Colorado drops this class. Only 2 Texans? Give me a break. Agree with Syko, absolutely no DT's is just an indictment on how bad the coaching staff is in building a quality program. And with people saying a lot of the players are questionable in terms of grades drops the grade to a F for me..
     
  6. White_Rabbit

    White_Rabbit Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    12,285
    Likes Received:
    886
    I gave it a C assuming everyone qualifies. Actually now that I think about it post voting I probably should have given it a D+ since this class is not close to average. If some of the questionable qualifiers don't get in I really don't see this class as being any better than an F or a D- at best. There's just too many guys that profile as special teams contributers and backups at best imo.
     
  7. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,549
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    On the bright side, nowhere to go but up, there's no chance of disappointment only a chance to be pleasantly surprised. I think I've discovered the secret to Jimmy's happiness. :smile2:
     
  8. JimmyBuff

    JimmyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,901
    Likes Received:
    227
    Now, that's a good way to look at it.. I guess if anyone becomes a good player from this class, I then can be pleasantly surprised.. If everyone sucks, why its no big deal because I had low expectations to begin with :smile2:
     
  9. Hank

    Hank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    6,511
    Likes Received:
    152
    I'll grade it next year. Right now, I don't care.
     
  10. Buffalo Brad

    Buffalo Brad Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    8,934
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    The lowest rated class ever for CU according to the Gary on News 4. Also showed we finished 10 spots below CSU, they did sign like 28 versus our 21.
     
  11. wsp4820

    wsp4820 Sally Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,218
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    I'd say strong...to very strong.
     
  12. PhillyBuff

    PhillyBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,987
    Likes Received:
    293
    I give Hawkins an "A" for effort and some positive reinforcement... but the results are a D-.......

    there seems to be a theme running here :)
     
  13. rodrigo

    rodrigo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    96
    I think this gets to the single biggest indictment of Hawkins - and paradoxically the biggest reason to feel some miniscule semblance of hope: For years (forever?) we've out-recruited the Lambs but still managed to get thoroughly mauled by them on the field last year.

    Universally acknowledged athletic class + strong coaching = wins on the field, overachieving, a program with potential. This class I'd give a C and the potential for a big upside. We all know where the trouble lies...
     
  14. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,928
    Likes Received:
    2,631
    A handful of players who can compete at the B12 level were signed. Hirchmann, Bell, Crabb, Tony Jones, Slavin and Poston. Most others are projects. Maybe they will surprise.

    Hawk always recruited "around the edges". At Boise IMO they took guys who were Pac-10 a-listers with grade or injury problems and filled the class with the Pac-10 b listers. Like when Fresno St. was in it's heyday, that approcah works like a charm in the WAC.

    IMO Hawk brought some of that approach to Boulder. The bright spot is that he has been able to land bona fide blue chippers (Scott, Kasa, Miller, Polk, Katoa, Major, MTM) and land some highly regarded kids (J. Smith, Jimmy Smith, Mohler, Jack Harris, Ussery, Darden, Deehan, Simas). There is considerable talent on the roster, but Hawk seems incapable of getting production.

    This class lacks any bona fide blue chippers and it is arguable of there are highly regarded guys either. At best, I'd say C. Given the strength of the B12, you need b or B+ classes to compete, especially where the coaching is sub-par.
     
  15. zbuff

    zbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,399
    Likes Received:
    706
    Rivals ranking: 66/141, last in B12; Scout ranking: 69/120, 10th in B12;

    How is this not a disaster? I gave the class an optimistic D. I believe 3 star recruits have skills and can be coached up, but the problem of course is our coaches haven't proved they can do that. We're still on the downhill slope.
     
  16. Rraalph 3000

    Rraalph 3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Messages:
    3,651
    Likes Received:
    79
    I give it a C, just for sheer hope & prayer that some of these guys turn out to be studs and Hawk can right the ship.....it's too depressing to try & accept reality
     
  17. buffsfan01

    buffsfan01 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    15
    i gave it a big fat D.....way to many rb wouldnt had needed more than 1 if ds and sumler were kept here but ,that's what happen's when you have very little playing time...to many te we didnt need more than 2. i fell it was a waste when we could have got some dt's..and let the state's top player's get away is a reason for a d....i know you cant keep or get them all it happens everywhere,but no reason not to get atleast 1 top 10 player in your own state, to me that speaks volume that the kids in your own backyard think's your coach is a lame duck and has no future at that school......GO buffs
     
  18. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,431
    Likes Received:
    4,455
    I gave it an incomplete. Until we see what the kids do on the field, it's hard to say if it was a successful effort or not. My suspicion is that we'll see 4-5 kids from this class who make an impact. The rest will provide depth, which is something we need. I will echo syko's remarks about the lack of DT recruiting. That's inexcusable.
     
  19. BuffMania

    BuffMania Banned BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    776
    Likes Received:
    29
    --Lowest ranked class in the Big12, behind even Baylor and Iowa State.
    --Just 2 kids from the state of CO
    --No signees from any of the Top10 players in CO
    --No DTs

    F
     
  20. BuffLuKe

    BuffLuKe Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    18,533
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    D
    Defensive recruiting was lackluster to say the least. With the article I just read, its not surprising. Unless some guys will be switching to DT and corner, we better not have anybody get hurt. That happens, we will have to pull a Patriots and have a guy wearing number #80 playing nickel back. Id be ok with that if we had Bill Belichick coaching our D. Not talking about Jefferson, just an example.
     
  21. SCB

    SCB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    107
    C

    We filled some needs. Think we did get some underrated talent and some guys with good size. Would have liked to get more D-lineman and kept Jones, Spond and Munchie. But overall, I think it's a decent class all things considered. F-the team rankings.
     
  22. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,261
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    C- No real guys that make me say WTF why and no real guys that have true superstar potential
     
  23. Daaah

    Daaah Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    17,437
    Likes Received:
    1,028
    D
    No superstars.
    Lots of kids without other offers.
    The commit/decomit battle went the wrong way in almost every instance when things were up in the air.

    But as others have said, who knows? It could turn out well.
     
  24. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,878
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    C-

    Better than most think it is, worse than it should have been.
     
  25. 77buff

    77buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,319
    Likes Received:
    57
    Once you lose the ability to recruit the best instate talent, you are dead in the water. The successful programs are built with the best instate players. D
     
    JimmyBuff likes this.
  26. 66BUFF

    66BUFF FTW Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,865
    Likes Received:
    315
    My scale

    1-20 = A
    21-35 = B
    36-45 = C
    46-55 = D
    56 + = F
     
  27. White_Rabbit

    White_Rabbit Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    12,285
    Likes Received:
    886
    sweet scale
     
    66BUFF likes this.
  28. BuffMania

    BuffMania Banned BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    776
    Likes Received:
    29
    We get ZERO of the Top10 recruits in Colorado, and some of you want to call this class average or (2 of you) better than average?

    Seriously?
     
  29. 13Buff

    13Buff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    606
    Likes Received:
    40
    I Gave it a C, I am hoping with this class we can stop hearing "We're young" as an excuse.
     
  30. bombay

    bombay Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    5,396
    Likes Received:
    1,035
    C. There's some good size and speed amongst the recruits, and if they all qualify there are several (T Jone, Hirshman, Uzo-Direbe, etc) who may be difference makers. Given Hawkins obvious lame duck status and the way things have gone on the field, I'm grateful to the young dudes that wanted to matriculate to Boulder.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2010

Share This Page