Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by JimmyBuff, Sep 26, 2009.
17-14 up on Michigan.. Not much defense in this game.
But come one, 2 of their 3 wins came against MAC teams. Oh wait, never mind. :smile2:
IU's missed a lot of chances in this game and they're still ahead. Michigan is reverting to futility.
And that's what happens when you let them hang around.
IU got jobbed, NCAA officials are so utterly clueless.
That definitely looked like dual possession and therefore should have been IU's ball.
It should have gone IU's way but the ruling on the field will typically get the benefit of the doubt. The Hoosiers often traded 7 points for 3 and 3 points for 0 with a lot of execution mistakes. Should have gone for the kill shot on Michigan earlier and the call wouldn't have decided the game.
BAD CALL....real bad call....but hey Mich won so they will move up in the polls
IU got hosed.
Yeah, and to make matters worse - it's not reviewable? You have to be kidding me! A change of possession play not reviewable? That needs to be changed.
They reviewed it.
Not according to the announcer, who said it was not reviewable.
Then why did they take about 5 minutes to review it?
I don't know - I thought they got ripped, heard the announcer say that, and changed the channel.
Didn't see the game ... just saw it briefly on ESPN highlights. But a dual possession possibility is defintely reviewable. If you recall in 2007 we won one in the OU game that was pivotal in our glorious upset of the Sooners ... we got the interception on a key series in the 4th quarter. :thumbsup:
Separate names with a comma.