1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Jack Graham's actual performance review

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by Buffnik, Aug 13, 2014.

  1. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,752
    Likes Received:
    16,467
  2. GoBuffs08

    GoBuffs08 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,814
    Likes Received:
    647
    good to see his own direct reports thought he was a douche.
     
  3. dio

    dio Admin Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    30,127
    Likes Received:
    2,551
    ouch. brutal
     
  4. sweaty teets

    sweaty teets Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,097
    Likes Received:
    1,431
  5. J.R. Ewing

    J.R. Ewing Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,925
    Likes Received:
    3,659
    Saddam got better reviews.
     
  6. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,752
    Likes Received:
    16,467
    [video=youtube;RAY27NU1Jog]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAY27NU1Jog[/video]
     
  7. Highlander

    Highlander Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,323
    Likes Received:
    1,567
    When I read pages 1 & 2, my thought was this was bull****. Upon further reading, ouch (and I believe it was legit).
     
  8. HotRack

    HotRack Rez BubbleHead Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,036
    Likes Received:
    476
    redacted?
     
  9. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,890
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    That report tells me 2 things either he sucks OR they have a culture issue and too many comfortable lifers at CSU that didnt like the shake-up. In my experience with academics and instutional workers the latter is often very prominent and anything that causes: change, accountability, turn over, progress is demonized.
     
  10. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,752
    Likes Received:
    16,467
    Entrepreneurs are not a good fit for university bureaucracies. There are 2 sides to this, for sure. But it was clearly not a healthy situation.
     
  11. J.R. Ewing

    J.R. Ewing Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,925
    Likes Received:
    3,659
    Could be an AND instead of an OR.
     
  12. Burrito Palazzo

    Burrito Palazzo huff my smug Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    31,707
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Jack "Not at all" Graham.
     
  13. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,890
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    good points
     
  14. MtnBuff

    MtnBuff Not allowed in Barzil 2 Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    26,453
    Likes Received:
    2,353
    I'd bet it's a lot of both. He almost certainly came in with an I'm the boss and we are going to get my priorities done mentality. That runs into secretaries and others who are used to things happening at a much slower pace and who were friendly with his predecessor.

    Two different mentalities to be sure.

    I've been involved in using and reviewing these kinds of assessments in educational settings. You to get the 1 - Not at all ratings usually means that he had some people very pissed off at him because normally even the worst performers will be given 2's or even 3's by their colleagues who don't want to be "mean."

    Even with this evaluation though I would gladly bet that if he had managed to put $70-100 million in the bank towards the new stadium we would not be having this discussion.

    The evaluation makes an effective excuse for Tony Frank to pull the plug on something that he thinks isn't working and isn't going to.
     
  15. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,283
    Likes Received:
    1,819
    Graham didn't get fired 3 weeks before the season because he was an asshole to his employees
     
  16. sweaty teets

    sweaty teets Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,097
    Likes Received:
    1,431
    Yup. He was fired because the donations are ready to roll in and a P5 invite is on the way.
     
  17. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,742
    Likes Received:
    4,747
    You better have some advocates if you are an asshole. Graham did not.
     
  18. MtnBuff

    MtnBuff Not allowed in Barzil 2 Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    26,453
    Likes Received:
    2,353
    fify

    but point well taken, sounds like nobody was shedding tears as he cleaned out his desk.
     
  19. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,532
    Likes Received:
    4,524

    This.
     
  20. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,532
    Likes Received:
    4,524
    My previous employer had a guy running the commercial banking division who was a total moron. He had zero people skills. He communicated poorly and inspired nobody to do anything other than the bare minimum. People made fun of him behind his back. They ran through commercial bankers like they were water. Every one of them, on their way out he door, let HR know in no uncertain terms what a douche the guy was. Productivity has stagnated, the stock price has plateaued, and turnover has been rampant.

    He's still there.

    He's a really good ass kisser. Sometimes, that's all that matters. Graham was clearly not a good ass kisser.
     
  21. Liver

    Liver modded mod Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    22,871
    Likes Received:
    2,692
    You guys ever do a 360 review? Top execs, especially entrepreneurs, frequently get trashed. How do you suppose steve jobs or bill gates would have done? I've been lucky and not had to do one of these as the subject but I've given feedback. That's all the redacted parts. You anonymously (allegedly) write what you think of the various leadership skills of the subject. It is brutal.

    Add in a bunch of lazy bitchy lifer guvmint workers and you are going to get a result like this. As was stated above, he got fired for not delivering. This is just some of the window dressing that gets laid on top.
     
  22. DBT

    DBT Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    58,583
    Likes Received:
    4,721
    "In 17 of the total 31 questions, Jack Graham was rated at the lowest levels by a majority of his direct reports/senior staff, at least 5 of 9."

    Wowzer! Sounds like moral in the AD was about as low as it could get. He appears to have been a dictator who treated others like garbage.
     
  23. tante

    tante Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    25,787
    Likes Received:
    1,359
    Is that where you interview yourself?
     
  24. Liver

    Liver modded mod Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    22,871
    Likes Received:
    2,692
    No. It is done by peers, direct reports, and others.
     
  25. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,890
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    I've been on the receiving end of several these, I score in a bi-polar fashion people love me or they hate me. I typically know who the latter are and they get fired.
     
  26. RalphieT

    RalphieT Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    19
    It's still an open question whether the performance review triggered the decision to fire, or the decision to fire triggered the performance review. It seems hard to believe that a stagnant, bureaucratic institution like a state university could move forward with firing someone within six weeks of a performance review being completed. Hell under normal circumstances it would probably take a month before anyone at the university got around to looking at the results. It seems hard to believe they could have the report reviewed by everyone necessary, make the decision to fire him, and line all the ducks up to get it done in the time between "June 2014" and last Friday. This seems like a convenient back-filled justification for a decision they'd already made.

    Now that I think about it, it seems a little fishy that the consultant put the date "June 2014" on it rather than the specific date the report was delivered. That seems like the sort of thing you do (or are told to do) when it's going to be nice to have some wiggle room in your timeline.
     
  27. Burrito Palazzo

    Burrito Palazzo huff my smug Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    31,707
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Wrongful termination. (Sarcasm font) My mom spent her whole career at CU and based on the stories I've heard, it's damn near impossible to get fired. (Not her behavior, others) At one point, she did work for Ward Churchill.
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2014
  28. BuffClass90

    BuffClass90 Banned BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    3,905
    Likes Received:
    96
    Wouldn't an effective leader know this and work with it?
     
  29. CUFan

    CUFan Welcome back Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    6,964
    Likes Received:
    470
    It's the public service way!
     
  30. BuffNut99

    BuffNut99 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    13,088
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    Having conducted these previously in a very similar context, you can almost be assured that the evaluation was used as a substantial part of the basis for the termination. Frank and others were likely receiving a ton of negative feedback, but they didn't have anything documented/actionable to drive a separation. They might have even given JG a timeline to improve, using the evaluation as the determinate as to whether or not he improved.

    One thing is certain after reading the eval: JG was down to at most two people who were still kissing his ass.
     

Share This Page