So I was looking over SoS so far this season. Here's what I found:
South
texas 18
ou 41
osu 46
texas a&m 38
texas tech 91 (their schedule gets much tougher starting Saturday)
baylor 35
North
mizzou 31
bugeaters 34
ISU 81
CU 10
KU 61
Teams that have had a tougher SoS so far:
Team, Rank, Record
Washington 1; 0-7
Virginia 2; 3-1 in the ACC (a loss to Duke, WTF?!), with a monumental loss to USC; are 5-3
Purdue 3; 2-6
Ore St 4; 4-3 (beat a USC and has the inside track to the Pac-10, at 4-3)
Duke 5; 5-3
USC 6; 7-1
ASU 7; 2-5
Washington St 8; 1-7
Arky 9; 3-5
4/10 of the teams have winning records.
Our SoS will go down since we play ISU and aTm, but with the hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far we've done ok. The end is not near, but we do need to put in some gamplans that give us a chance. We did not do that against Mizzou and that's what really bothers me.
Edit: Can't change the title! Ugh. Yeah, I know it's wrong.
South
texas 18
ou 41
osu 46
texas a&m 38
texas tech 91 (their schedule gets much tougher starting Saturday)
baylor 35
North
mizzou 31
bugeaters 34
ISU 81
CU 10
KU 61
Teams that have had a tougher SoS so far:
Team, Rank, Record
Washington 1; 0-7
Virginia 2; 3-1 in the ACC (a loss to Duke, WTF?!), with a monumental loss to USC; are 5-3
Purdue 3; 2-6
Ore St 4; 4-3 (beat a USC and has the inside track to the Pac-10, at 4-3)
Duke 5; 5-3
USC 6; 7-1
ASU 7; 2-5
Washington St 8; 1-7
Arky 9; 3-5
4/10 of the teams have winning records.
Our SoS will go down since we play ISU and aTm, but with the hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far we've done ok. The end is not near, but we do need to put in some gamplans that give us a chance. We did not do that against Mizzou and that's what really bothers me.
Edit: Can't change the title! Ugh. Yeah, I know it's wrong.
