1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The offense

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by Duff Man, Jul 22, 2013.

  1. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,734
    Likes Received:
    4,738
    O/U for points per game is 25.

    Place your bet...
     
  2. J.R. Ewing

    J.R. Ewing Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,914
    Likes Received:
    3,635
    That would put us at ~84th in the nation, up from 120th. It's a bit of a stretch, but I'll say over, but just barely.
     
  3. Liver

    Liver modded mod Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    22,871
    Likes Received:
    2,689
    over
     
  4. Quattro

    Quattro Banned BANNED Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    26,503
    Likes Received:
    761
  5. BuffLuKe

    BuffLuKe Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    18,556
    Likes Received:
    1,121
    Over, 26 a game.
     
  6. boydbuff

    boydbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    3,471
    Likes Received:
    110
    Over. Way better offensive system in place, better athletes on the field this year (including PRich), hopefully better QB play (hard to be worse).
     
  7. Buffalo Brad

    Buffalo Brad Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    8,949
    Likes Received:
    1,182
  8. dio

    dio Admin Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    30,123
    Likes Received:
    2,550
    Under
     
  9. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,281
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Over. Keeping Thomas and Hobbs would add ~2 pts/game imo
     
  10. ShaneHoover

    ShaneHoover Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2012
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    7
    Over because I am willing it...but I bet we are within 1.5 on either side.
     
  11. Junction

    Junction Moderator Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,534
    Likes Received:
    1,000,005
  12. buffaholic

    buffaholic Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    10,197
    Likes Received:
    1,635
    26.3 per game.
     
  13. zbuff

    zbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,412
    Likes Received:
    712
    That's about a TD higher than last year, which seems reasonable with the staff change, so I'm picking a push. But we may see even more turnovers than last year.
     
  14. TimmyDUBs

    TimmyDUBs Dirty haole Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    951
    under. Kool Aid went bad
     
  15. NashBuff

    NashBuff CSU Knob-Slobberer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,909
    Likes Received:
    57
  16. BuffClass90

    BuffClass90 Banned BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    3,905
    Likes Received:
    96
    Over. We may be one of the most improved offenses in the country this year. Besides, we need to score a lot with our D as bad as it is.
     
  17. Idot Buff

    Idot Buff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    10,677
    Likes Received:
    1,448
    Over.....take it from the expert.
     
  18. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,529
    Likes Received:
    4,518
    Is that purely offensive points or total team scores? Figure an average of 4-5 points per game from defense and special teams.
     
  19. CVilleBuff

    CVilleBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    19,527
    Likes Received:
    1,610
  20. FlatironsBuff

    FlatironsBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    10,831
    Likes Received:
    1,295
    Over. Just because I wish it to be so!

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
     
  21. BuffHerd

    BuffHerd Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,165
    Likes Received:
    315
  22. zbuff

    zbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,412
    Likes Received:
    712
    Last year we had exactly 1 TD from special teams and defense (that's 0.5 pts/gm). That will likely go up, but not this much.
     
  23. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,529
    Likes Received:
    4,518
    I didn't realize that. Although to be honest, our defense and special teams were atrocious last year. So lower that to 2 Pts per game average. The question remains.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
     
  24. Alfred91

    Alfred91 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2010
    Messages:
    5,356
    Likes Received:
    1,609
    Under.

    We'd have to score at lot in OOC games to keep the average up when we get to conference play.
     
  25. schubeal

    schubeal Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    7
    Under. Expect improvement but stronger defenses will still stifle us.
     
  26. CUwhit21

    CUwhit21 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    92
    Since 2003, the offense has averaged over 25 ppg exactly once (2007). That's 1 year out of 9. I don't see us breaking the trend in Mac's 1st year with the group we have. FWIW, he increased SJSU's ppg from 13.75 to 16.08 in his first year. A similar improvement would put us right around 20 ppg.

    I'm taking the under.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2013
  27. buffsyko

    buffsyko Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    10,658
    Likes Received:
    303
    Under unless we picked up alabama or wisconsin's OL.
     
  28. Quattro

    Quattro Banned BANNED Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    26,503
    Likes Received:
    761
    The game has also changed a lot since 2003 and the offenses for the most part have become more high powered with the rise of the spread. I also don't believe you can compare MM's first season to this one to make a point about improving the offensive scoring, other than they have 75 scholarship players due to APR sanctions. For starters, Lindgren was not the OC until MM's third year where he increased their scoring from 24.5ppg to 34.8ppg, or a 40% increase in scoring in one season. Now, at 17.8ppg with a 40% improvement would mean that the offense would be at 25ppg. I expect it to be easier to increase your scoring at the lower levels so I wholeheartedly believe that with the addition of PRich and Lindgren calling the plays a 40% increase is well within the realm of possibilities, or in fact a likely event.

    And I wish I could find it but MM said there was more talent on offense here than there was at SJSU last year.

    You don't need two of the best OL's in the nation to improve to the offensive scoring from 124th to ~84th, which is basically a touchdown a game improvement. Obviously the OL wasn't great but there were bigger issues on offense that killed the OL. Having no deep threat allowed teams to stack nine in the box since they could go man against Spruce and McCulloch and send guys to overwhelm the offensive line in terms of raw numbers. Having PRich back forces the defense to respect his speed and keep them honest, some playcalling creativity will help as well.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2013
  29. CUwhit21

    CUwhit21 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    92
    Even if what you're saying is true, how does that help our chances here and now? The fact that the spread offense has become more prevalent in college football has no relevance to CU. The only point in bringing this up is to show how rarely we've seen this happen in the last 9 years. Despite 4 coaches, numerous QBs, and numerous OCs, we've continued to struggle to find ways to score. The only constant I can find is the lack of playmaking passer.

    BTW, it's a good thing Hawkins put up 65 on Bill Callahan in 2007; otherwise, he would've missed the 25 ppg mark that year too.


    Was that directly due to Lindgren? Or was that due to David Fales? Or was that due to MM being in his third year at SJSU? After all, Lindgren may have improved playcalling, but he ran the offense he was given.

    Anyway, for me, the Yr. 1 improvement is relevant because it shows MM is not a miracle worker. It shows that even he needs the right QB for HIS system. I don't think Connor Wood is that guy so I won't expect a 40% increase in scoring in year 1.

    A likely event? It hasn't been a likely event for a decade. We've had receivers like PRich (Or even PRich himself). We've had well regarded offensive coordinators before. It's certainly going to come down to more than just one receiver who hasn't proven he can stay healthy or a brand new offensive coordinator with a brand new playbook.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2013
  30. rscmac

    rscmac Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    204
    under.
     

Share This Page