I can't speak for the other folks, but I was just messing with you with the verbose comment. So if you took it personally, you shouldn't. Around these parts abuse of fellow posters is just a way of saying welcome.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
The psychology and success of in-state kids - a discussion
- Thread starter aeroxx
- Start date
I can't speak for the other folks, but I was just messing with you with the verbose comment. So if you took it personally, you shouldn't. Around these parts abuse of fellow posters is just a way of saying welcome.
Previous posts were verbose. That one was douchey. :wink2:
aeroxx
New Member
Hey Creebuzz on a serious note, all banter aside, I think the Myers Briggs stuff is surprisingly accurate to a first order approximation. It gives very powerful insights into, who for instance, you would think are Aholes. The model has some serious flaws in my estimation. A better and more complete model is supplied by Harville Hendrix. It is more on personal relationships than casual relationships (but informs both). If one thinks the whole thing is a waste of time, then one probably needs to keep repeating the same pattern(s) of relationships a few more times, in order to see there is a clear pattern. For instance, one might ask, "why am I always surrounded by Aholes?" 
Hey Creebuzz on a serious note, all banter aside, I think the Myers Briggs stuff is surprisingly accurate to a first order approximation. It gives very powerful insights into, who for instance, you would think are Aholes. The model has some serious flaws in my estimation. A better and more complete model is supplied by Harville Hendrix. It is more on personal relationships than casual relationships (but informs both). If one thinks the whole thing is a waste of time, then one probably needs to keep repeating the same pattern(s) of relationships a few more times, in order to see there is a clear pattern. For instance, one might ask, "why am I always surrounded by Aholes?"
Oh! Oh! Oh! Call on me! I know this one!... "Because I'm at a sackygate."
If you are looking for pictures and fact-free and logic-free discussion Creebuzz, there are many alternatives...
This is hardly tolstoy. And if you think it is, then you probably need to some more practice reading...
While it's true that I usually only read comic books and the backs of cereal boxes, I was merely kidding in my remarks. If you stick around a while, you'll see that most everyone teases MtnBuff for the length of his posts.
