Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by NashBuff, May 27, 2011.
Voted for Logo Three myself...that logo does remind me a bit of the old Pac-10 logo and it is having a hot competition with Logo Two which is awesome looking.
3 but id be happy with 2
That is what I am thinking too.
2, but 3 is ok.
Nice formatting that you can't even see #4 on the page where you actually vote... :lol:
:lol: I think they might have done that on purpose...Logo Four sucked.
I don't like the light green logo color that #2 introduces.
I chose #2...the Roman numerals on #4 look horrendous, and for some reason the first thing I thought of when I saw #3 was the cover of a video game for an EA Sports game...between #1 and #2 I liked logo #2 a little bit more but I can't really qualify why...
I actually liked #4, but didn't vote on it because it would be a wasted vote (can't even see it on the screen). Went with 3 instead, which has a small lead currently. wohoo!
#2 for me.
too much Seattle Seahawks in that logo.
#1 looks the most solid and Bold. 3 looks like a frickin pineapple and 2 looks like the top of a wine glass.
From a branding standpoint, #1 doesn't emphasize Pac-12 enough and #2 doesn't emphasize football enough.
I don't know if the PAC-12 needs to be way bigger than the championship part for just the game. I like that it kind of says, "who cares about anyone else? This is THE championship game you should care about."
The bottom of #2 is like frankenstein's wife manicured bush.
#3 just feel weak with it's little frills. It just doesn't look solid to me. More like a high school championship game
I picked #3. But in Black and Gold.
If the roman numerals under #4 didn't look so strange, I'd have gone with that option.
I like two the best. #1 looks like some kind of super bowl knockoff.
Okay, how bout a compromise. This doesn't look great (I just downloaded the app and learned how to use it because of my 'vision.') I don't think I would want the sunrays in it but I couldn't figure out how to edit them out . . .
so those look the same to you?
I think the NFL pulled off a marketing masterstroke by using the Roman numbers for the Super Bowl and the P12 would be wise to follow suit. Just don´t use the year, but rather number the P12 CCG games.
between 2 and 3 for me. 1 does not have the pac 12 logo big enough. 4.... well, i just dont know wft 4 is about.
so, 2 and 3.... the spikes in 3 were just too.... well.... i dunno. so! 2 it is.
i think the roman numerals look like crap in that one. the point about roman numerals is they look like roman numerals and grant the "austerity" of the past. these are all new-fangly. i don't the Pac conf games numbered as "VI" in 6 years is going be meaningful. conference championship games are largely forgettable to everyone but the teams playing. this a new thing moving forward. also, the Big XII had roman numerals....so seems unnecessary and possibly derivative to me. jmo.
This has been a fun unproductive day . . . second edit of 1 and 3
Voted four for the same reason, but really any logo works.
Chose #4 but don't really care which one wins, all of them are ok.
Not gunna vote because they are all really bad.
Separate names with a comma.