Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

What is an acceptable recruiting class rank?

Liver said:
It was a million times less precise but there were a half dozen or so publishers that did recruiting. They were very good In general but it was all a lot more regional than now. That cut both ways because we could pull guys that wouldn't even be on the radar of an Alabama for example. Now every major school is national. Mac was actually on the cutting edge of national recruiting because he had to-- not enough elite guys in the Rockies.

Point remains however: recruit and win.
Click to expand...

CVilleBuff said:
Not top 20, but UVA has been in the 20s 3 of the last 4 years despite being crap except for an 8 win 2011 campaign. We'd all give our left nut for that. As alluded to, location matters. However, it doesn't excuse our current state of affairs. CU should be posting top 40 classes (and many years far higher) with consistency.
Click to expand...

Some times the problem is coaching. Sometimes the kids are overrated.

You can't measure heart or desire.
 
One thing you have to account for in terms of rankings for this year is the fact that we're offering less schollys than most of the other schools in the p5 which distorts our rank
 
DavisBuff said:
One thing you have to account for in terms of rankings for this year is the fact that we're offering less schollys than most of the other schools in the p5 which distorts our rank
Click to expand...
We are going to sign enough players, so this will not matter.
 
For rivals at least, only the top 20 count in the rankings. But if a school signs 25 that may help vs. a school who signs 20 bc their bottom 5 recruits wouldn't count

From phone
 
CVilleBuff said:
Not top 20, but UVA has been in the 20s 3 of the last 4 years despite being crap except for an 8 win 2011 campaign. We'd all give our left nut for that. As alluded to, location matters. However, it doesn't excuse our current state of affairs. CU should be posting top 40 classes (and many years far higher) with consistency.
Click to expand...

Yes. Kentucky was 17 last year, 24 this year. 29 in 2013.
 
SD Buff said:
For rivals at least, only the top 20 count in the rankings. But if a school signs 25 that may help vs. a school who signs 20 bc their bottom 5 recruits wouldn't count

From phone
Click to expand...
Oh I was referencing scout...I think scout just does a total points kind of thing but I'm not totally sure
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top