1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wow! Bringing down the BCS via the IRS???

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by OKCBuff, Sep 23, 2010.

  1. OKCBuff

    OKCBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,547
    Likes Received:
    48
  2. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,486
    Likes Received:
    16,061
    It's a very interesting point. If they can show that these bowls have done things that violate their tax exempt status, it's a major blow. I would think the IRS would love to get its hands into the bowl cookie jar.
     
  3. Buffarino

    Buffarino Math - how does it work? Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,547
    Likes Received:
    782
    Very interesting angle. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. The IRS will investigate, that is guaranteed. They are focusing on high dollar audits right now. This would fall right in that wheelhouse.
     
  4. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    A playoff will be the worst thing to happen to a program like CU. It would become exponentially harder for CU to win another national title. Though it seems improbable now, all we'd need to do now to get a title shot is go 12-0. But in a playoff, we'd have to go 12-0, then play one or two play-in games against Top 10 teams to still get that shot. I fear this scenario.
     
  5. dply

    dply Doble hoja Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    20,380
    Likes Received:
    2,470
  6. El Gringo

    El Gringo Pura Vida Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    5,160
    Likes Received:
    573
    Taxes are how they got Al Capone, why not the BCS?
     
  7. Mick Ronson

    Mick Ronson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    9,853
    Likes Received:
    266
    the NCAA TV monopoly was brought down by a Sherman Anti-Trust lawsuit in the 80's....that was considered a silly idea hatched over a steak dinner by a couple Norman attorneys....until it went to the Supreme Court and won. a landmark decision every college football fan should honor as they sit on the sofa for 14 hours of football on Saturdays. IRS, maybe?
     
  8. GregInArlington

    GregInArlington Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,907
    Likes Received:
    534
    I disagree. If we are not the best team, then we do not deserve to win the national title.
     
  9. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,486
    Likes Received:
    16,061
    I'm with you here.

    I don't see a playoff any time soon, though. The only way I see it happening is if we say 4 superconferences with 16 teams each. These superconferences would play a 2 round playoff and then the 2 winners would play a 2 round playoff. Outside of that, you could still have bowl games.
     
  10. BuffaloSoldier76

    BuffaloSoldier76 Unsound Meat Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    2,947
    Likes Received:
    229
    That is a naive statement. Under the current BCS system, to get a title shot we'd have to not only be 12-0, we'd also have to be ranked in the top two of a completely subjective voting process. Ask Auburn, Boise State, Utah, TCU, and several others how going undefeated worked out for them in their quests for a MNC. In a playoff system, you have to prove you're the best by beating the best, not by winning the beauty contest and then playing against the first runner-up in said beauty contest.
     
  11. MtnBuff

    MtnBuff Not allowed in Barzil 2 Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    26,377
    Likes Received:
    2,310
    Not going to happen. A) If this had been a valid argument the mid-majors would have gone after it a long time ago. These people are grasping at straws and while on the surface is sounds good and there is always a chance something will stick when thrown against the wall I don't see this happening. B) Even if it were valid, the states where BCS schools are important have enough influence in congress to adjust the law to maintain the system.

    Take all the SEC states, Texas, Oklahoma, most of the Big X states including Nebraska, Arizona, and some more and you have enough politicians who are not willing to upset the fans of the teams in their states. Tax laws are pretty easy to create exemptions for and if this case had any traction I would see an amendment to a tax bill being passed before anyone knew what happened.
     
  12. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    The best team does not win the NCAA Tournament every year. As a sport though, basketball is much more prone to upsets than football.

     
  13. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    The only example that applies from your list below is Auburn. You can add '94 Penn State too.

    All I am saying is that under a playoff system, even MORE things would need to fall perfectly in place for CU.

     
  14. Buffarino

    Buffarino Math - how does it work? Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,547
    Likes Received:
    782
    That's debateable. The number of things that have to go right to get into a playoff would be far less than the things needed to even play in the MNC game. Hell, just look at 2001 for an example of this.
     
  15. DBT

    DBT Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    58,257
    Likes Received:
    4,579
    Yeah. Getting the IRS involved in college football is a great idea! I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
     
  16. buff4bcs1985

    buff4bcs1985 Hail to the King

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    26,000
    Likes Received:
    2,116
    They'll Never Take me Alive!!!!!!!
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  17. bombay

    bombay Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Hell, playing in the national championship game isn't that hard. You can lose your last regular season game by 26 points, giving up 62 in the process, and still make the game.
     
  18. ScottyBuff

    ScottyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    91
    CU has won the Big 12 once since the formation of the league, that didn't result in a "shot" at national title in the BCS system, but it would in a playoff.

    Throw in top 8 finishes in 1989, 1994, 1995, and 1996 that might have resulted in an "at-large" bid and we would have far more opportunities in a playoff than without.
     
  19. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,608
    Likes Received:
    508
    Only because we had 2 losses that year.
     
  20. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ok, if you consider an "opportunity" the chance to play two more games against Top 5 teams, an almost impossible gauntlet to survive. I'd say it would be easier to win all of your regular season games (surely not all against Top 5 teams).

    We got boxed out in '01 because we had L's on the record.

     
  21. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    So assume we go 12-0 next year, under the current BCS format. Barring an Auburn-like fluke, it is safe to assume that we'd be invited to the BCS title game. Win that game and we are champs.

    Meanwhile, if we were under a playoff, we'd go 12-0, and likely have to win TWO more playoff games, against very stiff competition, to get the title.

    Which is harder?

     
  22. DBT

    DBT Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    58,257
    Likes Received:
    4,579
    Going 12-0?
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  23. AlferdJasper

    AlferdJasper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,531
    Likes Received:
    670
    is it just me, or does any one else love the phrase "frivolous benefits?"

    stoudt burrito.jpg
     
  24. Nor Cal Buff

    Nor Cal Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    64
    It's very rare for 3 teams from BCS conferences to go undefeated in the same season. It would certainly be easier to "fluke" a national championship under a playoff system than what we have now. But it would also be harder to win a national championship under a playoff system if we were truly the best team in country. Basically a larger sample size is better at determining the best team than a knockout tournament. Personally I'm pretty happy with the current format.
     
  25. ScottyBuff

    ScottyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    91
    Of course, it all depends.

    What is your pre-season ranking, strength of schedule, other top teams' records, etc etc etc (none of which the players on the field control).

    So, you say "harder" to win 2 or 3 games of a playoff, but I say "harder" to get all the above stars to align on a perfect season.

    Would it not also be "easier" to win your conference, either going 9-3 or 10-2 (in which case we would have no shot at a MNC BCS title game berth) then catching the ACC champion in round 1 and the other semifinal winner for the title?

    But at least it would be "easier" for the players to control.

    And yes, 2001 we were "locked out" of the BCS due to losses, but why does that negate anything? In a playoff with conference champions, we would get in because we won the game that mattered: the Big 12 Championship. Maybe we still play Oregon in a playoff and lose, but that opportunity would have at least given us a chance to play for a title, whereas before we had NO such opportunity the moment the L's were in the books in the BCS system.
     
  26. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    Valid points. I guess what I'm thinking is that if we win the Pac 12 with a 9-3 or 10-2 record, the odds are low that we will make it through the playoff anyways. We'd likely get waxed by an undefeated SEC/Big Ten champ.

     
  27. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    Then again, anything can happen. Just look at the end of the '01 season. We turned a good season into a great season just by beating NU and UT. So a team can get hot and run the table come playoff time, I suppose.

    Looking back on that year, it is interesting to me that CU fans were clamoring for us to have a national title shot. Sure, that's classic homerism there. But it was also absurd. We lost to Fresno Freaking State, which should have disqualified us for the get-go. We also got waxed by Texas. The only solid regular season win was over NU, though it was a major pasting.

    If anything, Oregon should have got the title shot.
     
  28. CUFan

    CUFan Welcome back Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    6,928
    Likes Received:
    456
    In retrospect Oregon should have gotten the title shot. However, we had a much tougher schedule than Oregon did that year. Plus Fresno was a Top 10 team with David Carr. It was a tough argument before the championship game.

    The only thing that was clear was that the system was fatally flawed because the Nubs, who we hung 62 on, limped into the championship game and got pummeled. The entire college football world knew the Nubs had no business in that game.
     
  29. B1Buff

    B1Buff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    39
    By your logic we should just step down to the FCS that way we can play cupcakes every week. First of all, playoff or no playoff, I don't see us in this conversation either way for a while. Secondly, a point to ponder...what is better, winning a championship in a flawed system based on politics and the judgement of people that know little about college football or winning a championship based soley on the performance of your team (ie winning 4 games in a playoff against solid opponents)? I really do get tired of the pussification of this program which is now apparently spreading to the fans.
     
  30. UrbanaBuff

    UrbanaBuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    13
    You need to wake up to reality, brother. Either that or go root for a perennial winner like Alabama or Ohio State.

    You need lots of luck in addition to skill to survive 4 rounds of a college football playoff. If the NCAA Tournament added a few more rounds, that would make it harder for everyone to make it all the way through to the Final Four. And it would serve to weed out all but the very best of programs. Sure, as a CU fan you want us to run the table over the Floridas and USCs of the world. But that would never happen these days because as it relates to football, CU is not on that elite level anymore. This means we'd be victims more than beneficiaries of a playoff system. So while it may have helped us in the late 80s / early 90s, I doubt it would going forward.

     

Share This Page