Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by JimmyBuff, Oct 18, 2012.
Take USC. We haven't covered in any loss.
We're gonna win.
Another thread about the point spread. Nice.
There should be 40 of them.
For me, it's more about spreadin' the points, all over USC.
should be 60 - and 100+ for oregon
Didn't see the others.
And here comes buffaloflyer bringing up Stanford vs USC '06 in 3...2....1....
Surprised it is that low. Face it, we suck and have for a while now.
Give me Jim Harbough and that coaching staff and I'd feel we *might* have a shot. With Embree, not so much.
Sad situation, really. I didn't think it would get this bad.
Barkley won't play past two drives in the third quarter. Backups the rest of the way.
They'll cover by halftime.
40.5 as of right now. The over/under is only 57.5.
wow they think we could score double digit points?
I put BIG HUGE money ($40) on the Buffs to cover. Y'all are scaring me but I think they'll show some resolve... maybe. Hopefully USC will pull their starters by the end of the first quarter.
quick bet the opposite! at least you will only lose the transaction fees!
USC will run up the score. Count on it.
Not sure why people are getting hung up on the USC spread. 1) It's low and 2) the Oregon spread is going to be the real wake-up call.
I disagree, because handicappers will take into account that Chip Kelly called off the dogs after the 1st quarter last season. No one is expecting Kiffin to show any class.
That means Vega$ is thinking CU 8 USC 49! 2 FG's and a Safety! Sounds about right...
FYI, we were +26 vs. Texas in 2005 CCG.
PhatMack, I don't like your chances.
Just remember, that in 2007, USC was a 42 point favorite over Stanford, and Stanford won the game. I believe I read that that was the largest upset in history.
nm, I feel like Steve Martin trying to keep rhythm at the beginning of The Jerk.
Only 41? Pretty good for this POS team.
No way we stop USC from covering. Only way is if Kiffen calls off the dogs in the second quarter. This is a classic case of men against boys.
Separate names with a comma.