What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Solder out for season with torn biceps

Jens1893

Club Member
Club Member
Junta Member
For 2 years and 20m. Will become a free agent after the 2017 season. Terms of this extension prohibit the Pats from using the franchise or transition tag on him then.
 
Terms of this extension prohibit the Pats from using the franchise or transition tag on him then.
Interesting; is this allowed in the CBA? I would guess a lot more guys would put this into their extensions if so. I would think that teams would like to do it as well because theoretically they'd get some concessions in return for putting the "no franchise" tag in the contract, and the chances they'd want to franchise any given player are pretty low.
 
Interesting; is this allowed in the CBA? I would guess a lot more guys would put this into their extensions if so. I would think that teams would like to do it as well because theoretically they'd get some concessions in return for putting the "no franchise" tag in the contract, and the chances they'd want to franchise any given player are pretty low.

Apparently nothing in the CBA prohibits it. It's kind of like a no-trade clause or a restricted trade clause (only to certain cities or not to others) all up for negotiation.

Unlike most guys Nate is good enough to demand and get the clause in his deal.

The Pat's know that using the franchise tag on him might end up costing more and piss him off pushing him to leave, this is a good deal for all sides.
 
Richest guy in Buena Vista. If he even steps foot in Buena Vista anymore. Good for him. Now, donate a million to CU, Nate!! Haha.
 
Interesting; is this allowed in the CBA? I would guess a lot more guys would put this into their extensions if so. I would think that teams would like to do it as well because theoretically they'd get some concessions in return for putting the "no franchise" tag in the contract, and the chances they'd want to franchise any given player are pretty low.

Both sides win something here. Solder gets a fully guaranteed 20m deal and the guarantee that he can´t be tagged and can hit the open market at 29 in exchange for total long term security as the Pats probably didn´t want to pull the trigger and give him a 4 or 5 year extension like the Skins did with Trent Williams (5 years, 66m, 30m in full guarantees). It´s a compromise.
 
Richest guy in Buena Vista. If he even steps foot in Buena Vista anymore. Good for him. Now, donate a million to CU, Nate!! Haha.
He does. His parents actually live in Leadville and are good friends with my aunt. I've visited with them a few times.
 
Back
Top