What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

New Alamo Bowl matchups?

Hmmmm

Not sure if it'd happen but I'd love to see more Big-XII/Pac-10 Bowl match ups...


:yeahthat:

And this makes perfect sense. The Pac-10 needs more higher caliber bowl tie ins, and the Big 11 is already tied into too many other bowls to provide a team on the same level as the teams the Big XII sends to that game.

We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:
 
:yeahthat:

And this makes perfect sense. The Pac-10 needs more higher caliber bowl tie ins, and the Big 11 is already tied into too many other bowls to provide a team on the same level as the teams the Big XII sends to that game.

We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:

:nod:

At least DD and I lived in SA for a year so we know where to get good margs for him to drown his sorrows.
 
We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:

CU better hope it's Montana and not Locker:smile2:

Locker was just timed at a 4.38 40, and this is his first year with a real coach:thumbsup:

Does anyone at CU run under 4.4 in the 40?
 
CU better hope it's Montana and not Locker:smile2:

Locker was just timed at a 4.38 40, and this is his first year with a real coach:thumbsup:

Does anyone at CU run under 4.4 in the 40?

Not worried... By the time Locker gets UW to an Alamo level Bowl, the Buffs will have moved on to the BCS.... :smile2:
 
CU better hope it's Montana and not Locker:smile2:

Locker was just timed at a 4.38 40, and this is his first year with a real coach:thumbsup:

Does anyone at CU run under 4.4 in the 40?

Locker just needs to stop celebrating so much after a last second and he'd be a real winner.
 
:yeahthat:

And this makes perfect sense. The Pac-10 needs more higher caliber bowl tie ins, and the Big 11 is already tied into too many other bowls to provide a team on the same level as the teams the Big XII sends to that game.

We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:

agreed, the Holiday Bowl is Pac #2 against the Big XII 3 or 4.

i've tried but the Big 10 minus a few teams (would love to play tOSU, UM or Penn State...and the Wisconsin series the 90's was fun) the Big 10 is kind of a snoozer.

a big XII-pac matchup would be preferable to me.
 
Back
Top