LABuffalo
Member
http://forums.5atexasfootball.com/showthread.php?t=58458
Found this reading CBS/Dodd article about conference expansions.
Found this reading CBS/Dodd article about conference expansions.
All of the Big Eight schools were in the Central Time Zone. The most distant school from Austin was Iowa State, 840 miles away.
Not finished reading, but the author omits us entirely with
Interesting, I would have thought the address for the Big 12 would have read:so the article got me thinking about expansion and I did a trademark search for a few terms like "Super 14 Conference, Super 16 Conference, Big 14 Conference, Big 16 Conference" to see if the Big 10 OR Big 12 had reserved the trademark and all came up unregistered and this came up:
Big 14
(APPLICANT) The Big Twelve Conference, Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 400 East John Carpenter Freeway Irving TEXAS 75062
Filing Date: February 6, 2009
Frustrating to see just how much UT ****ed us in the ass. Looks like NU had it right all along and I *hate* saying that. @)*$#
What exactly has UT done that has hurt CU? The academic qualifier issue was something that CU was pushing for in the Big 8 but did not have enough clout. The limiting of partial qualifiers actually helped level the playing field for CU. Academically CU and UT are more closely aligned than the other Big 12 schools. Probably the most controversial issue is revenue sharing in the Big 12 but CU would probably side with UT on that issue also since we get rewarded more for playing tough teams on National TV (personally I think equal revenue sharing makes the conference stronger).
I would like to hear why people think Texas is hurting CU?
What exactly has UT done that has hurt CU? The academic qualifier issue was something that CU was pushing for in the Big 8 but did not have enough clout. The limiting of partial qualifiers actually helped level the playing field for CU. Academically CU and UT are more closely aligned than the other Big 12 schools. Probably the most controversial issue is revenue sharing in the Big 12 but CU would probably side with UT on that issue also since we get rewarded more for playing tough teams on National TV (personally I think equal revenue sharing makes the conference stronger).
I would like to hear why people think Texas is hurting CU?
They almost killed Joel Klatt...does that count?
I'm lukewarm on this issue, but will play devil's advocate and respond to your query.
Unfortunately, CU has to play national powers in order to realize greater revenue under the B12 current policy, but Texas does not. They likely have almost every one of their games televised every year, and it hasn't done much to improve their scheduling--since OSU beat them in Austin they have avoided any tough OOC opponents. As is set up now, the rich get richer and the gap continues to widen, as opposed to the Big 10, for example.
Another thing that pisses me off is the fact that the B12 championship is almost always played in Texas. While that is not really a concern for buff fans as of late, it was essentially a home game for UT and OU in the championship games the buffs did play in. Invesco is a state-of-the-art facility, and should be included in the rotation.
And finally, I am jealous of all their posessions.
I wonder if Denver has made any bids to host the Big 12 championship game. Has Denver ever hosted the Big 12 basketball championships, either? It would seem that would be a reasonable venue for a game, too.
But -- truth be told, the Big 12 conference has played 14 football conference championship games. 7 have been played in Texas. 7 have been played in Missouri.
Maybe a little...that guy should of been suspended...Rusty the dog is another reason.
What exactly has UT done that has hurt CU? The academic qualifier issue was something that CU was pushing for in the Big 8 but did not have enough clout. The limiting of partial qualifiers actually helped level the playing field for CU. Academically CU and UT are more closely aligned than the other Big 12 schools. Probably the most controversial issue is revenue sharing in the Big 12 but CU would probably side with UT on that issue also since we get rewarded more for playing tough teams on National TV (personally I think equal revenue sharing makes the conference stronger).
I would like to hear why people think Texas is hurting CU?