What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

NCAA Lawsuit: Ex-Players want to be compensated

Should ex-players be compensated?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 11.1%
  • No

    Votes: 14 77.8%
  • I've got no clue but wanted to vote anyway

    Votes: 2 11.1%

  • Total voters
    18

Buffnik

Real name isn't Nik
Club Member
Junta Member
http://ncaabasketball.fanhouse.com/2010/05/26/ncaa-facing-its-own-erin-brockovich/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

The key issue of the lawsuit is this: Should the NCAA compensate former players for the right to sell products -- like video games, highlight videos and jerseys -- that use their likeness, image, names and other intellectual property?

The NCAA, naturally, believes it should not, arguing that it does not actually profit from players' likenesses, and furthermore that all college athletes sign a form that forfeits their right to receive payment from the NCAA or its business partners.

On the other side, of course, are athletes such as O'Bannon, Keller and a growing list of others, including former Michigan and NBA center Eric Riley and Alex Gilbert, who played alongside Bird at Indiana State, who have never seen a penny as the NCAA has morphed into a behemoth that generates huge sums -- reportedly $4 billion annually -- from licensing and media deals. O'Bannon was the lead plaintiff in a case that focused on the NCAA's use of former players' images and likenesses to sell DVDs, "classic" photos and jerseys, while Keller's suit was focused primarily on the video game industry, and in particular how Electronic Arts, the video game titan, utilizes players' likenesses in their games.

**********

The courts have combined the O'Bannon and Keller cases and there's a decent chance this will go class action. Thoughts?
 
Nope. They signed on agreeing to play football for their school for a full ride scholarship, which is a hefty chunk of change. I don't have a problem with them fighting for future player's rights, but this is just another lazy way to try to get a payday.
 
Nope. They signed on agreeing to play football for their school for a full ride scholarship, which is a hefty chunk of change. I don't have a problem with them fighting for future player's rights, but this is just another lazy way to try to get a payday.


Are you saying talented walk-ons, who receive no compensation other than the glory of playing college ball, are NOT featured in the video games and highlight videos?
 
Are you saying talented walk-ons, who receive no compensation other than the glory of playing college ball, are NOT featured in the video games and highlight videos?

if you are a talented walk-on you earn a free scholarship.
 
Oh no. We're going to get into the discussion of whether their education is free or not. Run for the hills.
 
If the NCAA is using their likeness AFTER the player is no longer playing, then yes.
 
If the NCAA is using their likeness AFTER the player is no longer playing, then yes.

I agree with you whole heartedly.

Does anyone know what happens to those royalties paid to the NCAA? are they redistributed to member institutions?
 
Back
Top