Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official ****braska Hate Thread

TSchekler said:
I don’t get the idea of a university telling a kid where he can and can’t transfer. He already has to lose a year of eligibility by leaving, so what asshole decided that the former university got to deny transferring to certain programs and why?
Click to expand...

Agree. This is a terrible system. Easy solution is to make it a blanket rule no transfers to schools on the former team's schedule while the player has eligibility. Allowing the Nebraska's of the world to pick and choose is awful.
 
We all know (be honest about it) that as many kids commit to a coach as commit to a school.

It would be fair and appropriate that as long as that school is not on the schedule of the school losing the player that players should be able to follow a fired coach without penalty to his new HC job.
 
Stampeder said:
Agree. This is a terrible system. Easy solution is to make it a blanket rule no transfers to schools on the former team's schedule while the player has eligibility. Allowing the Nebraska's of the world to pick and choose is awful.
Click to expand...
I think that could be the rule and the school would have the option to waive it.
 
MtnBuff said:
We all know (be honest about it) that as many kids commit to a coach as commit to a school.

It would be fair and appropriate that as long as that school is not on the schedule of the school losing the player that players should be able to follow a fired coach without penalty to his new HC job.
Click to expand...
In the case of Bell, he was a Frost recruit. He's a juco who only has a limited window to show himself for NFL scouts and he got demoted to 2nd string last week.
 
Stampeder said:
Agree. This is a terrible system. Easy solution is to make it a blanket rule no transfers to schools on the former team's schedule while the player has eligibility. Allowing the Nebraska's of the world to pick and choose is awful.
Click to expand...

How about Greg Bell can go wherever the **** he wants? Why do coaches get to leave whenever they want but we're restricting kids?
 
Last edited:
Buffnik said:
In the case of Bell, he was a Frost recruit. He's a juco who only has a limited window to show himself for NFL scouts and he got demoted to 2nd string last week.
Click to expand...

You are right on this one. Puts the kid in a bad situation though.
 
Adding Oregon State means that there are other potential players that might transfer to the school where the former coach is affiliated. The roster is so weak, that even though they want to clean house of anyone not wanting to be there, but losing anymore kids would be really tough.

The tone in Nebraska has gone from we are going to compete for the Big 10 title to there is a good vibe and the kids MIGHT find a way to finally win a game. What a bunch of delusional fools not accepting it is a full rebuild, and that there are maybe 3-4 kids that would be effective players on any other big time roster in the Big 10. It is going to take 3 years and 3 more classes to get the depth built back up. Is there no reality for these folks.

It is nice to be essentially 10 games better than the Huskers 5-0 : 0-5, not correct math, but it makes me feel better.
 
I don't think their roster is as bad as most seem to think it is. The team that played us showed talent and showed flashes versus Purdue and Wisconsin. They've just looked undisciplined and disorganized most of the time. That DC needs to go. Not sure what Frost was thinking bringing his entire UCF staff. Also not sure what he was thinking not making QB depth priority #1.
 
“When you are sick, sometimes you have to puke it out.”

But no puking in the direction of the B1G, Colorado, Oklahoma, Oregon State, and various directional schools.
 
4BienemyTDs said:
Adding Oregon State means that there are other potential players that might transfer to the school where the former coach is affiliated. The roster is so weak, that even though they want to clean house of anyone not wanting to be there, but losing anymore kids would be really tough.
Click to expand...
Up next - IRON MAN FOOTBALL!!!
 
b3buffs said:
There is a new rule starting next Monday. I wonder if this allows Bell to hold off on transferring until next week and get to go wherever he wants as long as the conference has no objections.

http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources...er-rule-eliminates-permission-contact-process
Click to expand...

I hope that Bell has held off on filing his paperwork long enough for this to apply.

It would be great for him to stick this in the eye of Frost and the fuskers and transfer to one of the schools on their list.
 
That transfer letter said the schools could not contact the athlete. What happens if the athlete shows up at Oregon State's facility and says I want in? Further, say the kid enrolls wtf can f*ck nebraska do other than withhold transcripts? (I don't think any reasonable registrar would do that for a whiny assed b*tch coach.)
 
lvbuff said:
That transfer letter said the schools could not contact the athlete. What happens if the athlete shows up at Oregon State's facility and says I want in? Further, say the kid enrolls wtf can f*ck nebraska do other than withhold transcripts? (I don't think any reasonable registrar would do that for a whiny assed b*tch coach.)
Click to expand...
Every part of NU answers to the football program. Trust me that their registrar would do that.
 
lvbuff said:
That transfer letter said the schools could not contact the athlete. What happens if the athlete shows up at Oregon State's facility and says I want in? Further, say the kid enrolls wtf can f*ck nebraska do other than withhold transcripts? (I don't think any reasonable registrar would do that for a whiny assed b*tch coach.)
Click to expand...
I believe the issue is with aid money. A player can transfer, enroll anywhere they want and play as a walk on (I am reasonably sure). But when the school doesn't release a transfer to certain schools, the player cannot get sports related aid (or I guess the same sports related aid) at the new school for one year (again I think it is one year). Or something along those lines.
 
4BienemyTDs said:
Adding Oregon State means that there are other potential players that might transfer to the school where the former coach is affiliated. The roster is so weak, that even though they want to clean house of anyone not wanting to be there, but losing anymore kids would be really tough.

The tone in Nebraska has gone from we are going to compete for the Big 10 title to there is a good vibe and the kids MIGHT find a way to finally win a game. What a bunch of delusional fools not accepting it is a full rebuild, and that there are maybe 3-4 kids that would be effective players on any other big time roster in the Big 10. It is going to take 3 years and 3 more classes to get the depth built back up. Is there no reality for these folks.

It is nice to be essentially 10 games better than the Huskers 5-0 : 0-5, not correct math, but it makes me feel better.
Click to expand...

You know you've arrived when Nebraska considers playing you tough a moral victory
 






giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top