What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official Bowl Games Thread

A guy who charges a boatload for sports betting picks and is a known scammer touted under 28.5 for the 1H. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Who knows man, my buddy had the under 41.5 Half score in the bama OU game and we all thought he was toast at the end of the first lol.
 
I can’t believe I convinced myself to only put half my Bovada account on the over :( I really thought the elite defenses had at least a chance to prove better than this
 
How can Alabama not find a kicker?
There was a good article in the WSJ about Bama’s history of poor kicking under Saban and, believe it or not, there is precedent to suggest it’s due to the fact that Saban has insisted on having his starting QB be the holder. When that happens, there’s very little to no practice time devoted to the snapper, holder, and kicker all working together. Tifwiw, but it was a timely article.
 
Does CU have an "exercise science" major? Unless you include Kinesiology ... I don't think so.
 
It's funny how these games seem to go differently than we expect. I expected much more balance between the offenses or defenses winning. This could be won be scoring in the 40s, it looks like.
 
these two teams just drip talent...laviska is the only buff who would see the field on these two teams
C'mon man. That's a little over the top. You act as if 100% of the players on both rosters will be NFL players. That is not the case and Viska is not the only NFL guy on our roster.
 
You said "see the field". Now you've changed it to start.
Fwiw, I don’t think anybody on CU’s roster would see the field outside of Viska. Landman might get some run on ST and see LB in mop up, and Antwine/Mustafa might get some run in mop up as well, but that’s how wide the talent gap is between these two teams and CU at the moment. Just my opinion.
 
C'mon man. That's a little over the top. You act as if 100% of the players on both rosters will be NFL players. That is not the case and Viska is not the only NFL guy on our roster.
Who else starts for CU starts on Bama?
 
I think only Viska and Landman would see time when it mattered. No one else. And Landman would be rotational not starting
 
Back
Top