Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU Over/Under 4.5

Limon Jack

Limon Jack

Member
Pac-12

  • Washington: 9.5 (Over -124, Under -124)
  • Oregon: 9 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Utah: 9 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • Washington State 8.5 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Arizona State: 7.5 (Over +125, Under -145)
  • Arizona: 7 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Stanford: 6.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • USC: 6.5 (Over -114, Under -102)
  • Cal: 6 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • UCLA: 5.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Colorado: 4.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Oregon State: 2.5 (Over +130, Under -155)

(Source - FanDuel)

CU Non Con:

Colorado State - 3.5
Nebraska - 8.5
Air Force - 6.5
 
.5 games better than the Red Polyester Horde won with their savior oh boy coach last year.

not much love for USC's revamped Helton disaster and Stanford......i would bet against both Arizona school on principle. something is outta whack in the desert southwest and big time power college football. something....

might be taking a flier on Chip at UCLA.....5.5?

buckle up yer Sansabelts fat boy.....oh wait.
 
J.R. Ewing said:
I kinda thought Stanford was in for a down year. They're pretty green in a few units.
Click to expand...
They are also a very weird team to figure out the last couple of years. They were one of the worst rushing teams in the country last year which almost seems impossible.
 
onealcd said:
They are also a very weird team to figure out the last couple of years. They were one of the worst rushing teams in the country last year which almost seems impossible.
Click to expand...

Love was hobbled and they're offensive line was exceptionally bad. They were 124th in the nation in rushes stopped behind the LOS. Granted they had some injuries, but they still had 4 senior start 38 games for them on the OL. Don't know how that unit has gotten so bad for Stanford.

https://www.sbnation.com/college-fo...tanford-football-2019-preview-schedule-roster
 
It sucks cuz I think we are going to be a better team but our schedule may keep us out of a bowl game.
 
Limon Jack said:
Pac-12

  • Washington: 9.5 (Over -124, Under -124)
  • Oregon: 9 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Utah: 9 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • Washington State 8.5 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Arizona State: 7.5 (Over +125, Under -145)
  • Arizona: 7 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Stanford: 6.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • USC: 6.5 (Over -114, Under -102)
  • Cal: 6 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • UCLA: 5.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Colorado: 4.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Oregon State: 2.5 (Over +130, Under -155)

(Source - FanDuel)

CU Non Con:

Colorado State - 3.5
Nebraska - 8.5
Air Force - 6.5
Click to expand...

nuh under 8.5 is a big bet. If it gets to 9, heloc may be engaged.
 
Without diving into how bye weeks could affect certain games, I think 6.5 for USC is about right, tbh.

Two sure fire losses on the road to UW and ND, probable losses to Utah, Oregon and Stanford at home, and then toss ups/slight SC favorites vs UA and UCLA at home and CU, ASU and Cal on the road. Fresno State at home in week one is surely a win and I don't really know how BYU is supposed to be this year, but they travel to Provo, so I see as a toss up/slight SC favorite matchup.

For them, I think a lot depends on how they handle the first 4 weeks. 4-0/3-1, and I think they have the confidence to keep playing well for Helton and hit the over. If they go 2-2 (which I think it likely) heading into roadies against UW and ND, I think they come out 2-4, with an apathetic attitude and things probably snowball from there.
 
TSchekler said:
Without diving into how bye weeks could affect certain games, I think 6.5 for USC is about right, tbh.

Two sure fire losses on the road to UW and ND, probable losses to Utah, Oregon and Stanford at home, and then toss ups/slight SC favorites vs UA and UCLA at home and CU, ASU and Cal on the road. Fresno State at home in week one is surely a win and I don't really know how BYU is supposed to be this year, but they travel to Provo, so I see as a toss up/slight SC favorite matchup.

For them, I think a lot depends on how they handle the first 4 weeks. 4-0/3-1, and I think they have the confidence to keep playing well for Helton and hit the over. If they go 2-2 (which I think it likely) heading into roadies against UW and ND, I think they come out 2-4, with an apathetic attitude and things probably snowball from there.
Click to expand...

I've got no idea what USC is going to even be as a team. They seem like they could continue their tailspin or play or play up to their recruiting rankings. Neither would really surprise me.
 
J.R. Ewing said:
I've got no idea what USC is going to even be as a team. They seem like they could continue their tailspin or play or play up to their recruiting rankings. Neither would really surprise me.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's why I think so much rides on the first 4 games for them, which includes Stanford and Utah (both at home) and the team mentality going into Washington and ND road games.
 
TSchekler said:
Yeah, that's why I think so much rides on the first 4 games for them, which includes Stanford and Utah (both at home) and the team mentality going into Washington and ND road games.
Click to expand...
I think they could be in for a season that looks like Oregon's '16 season or even worse. If they start 2-4 or 3-3, do they have the grit to rally for the back half or do they mail in in playing for a dead-man-walking coach?
 
Limon Jack said:
Pac-12

  • Washington: 9.5 (Over -124, Under -124)
  • Oregon: 9 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Utah: 9 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • Washington State 8.5 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Arizona State: 7.5 (Over +125, Under -145)
  • Arizona: 7 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Stanford: 6.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • USC: 6.5 (Over -114, Under -102)
  • Cal: 6 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • UCLA: 5.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Colorado: 4.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Oregon State: 2.5 (Over +130, Under -155)

(Source - FanDuel)

CU Non Con:

Colorado State - 3.5
Nebraska - 8.5
Air Force - 6.5
Click to expand...

Am I the only one who thinks 2.5 on the Beavs looks really good? Nubs under is easy $$$$$ and I'd take AFA to win at least 7 in that conference.
 
ahoelsken said:
Am I the only one who thinks 2.5 on the Beavs looks really good? Nubs under is easy $$$$$ and I'd take AFA to win at least 7 in that conference.
Click to expand...
Air Force was a 5 win team in that conference last year.

Oregon State Over only looks good because it's hard to imagine a team not winning at least 3 games in today's landscape, but they start vs Okie State and then travel to Hawaii before finishing OOC vs Cal Poly. Their Pac 12 schedule is a tough one as well. The three best teams on their schedule (Washington, Utah and Stanford) are all home games and surefire losses, and they travel to Washington State and Oregon. They should be heavy underdogs vs everyone on their schedule except Cal Poly.
 
TSchekler said:
Air Force was a 5 win team in that conference last year.

Oregon State Over only looks good because it's hard to imagine a team not winning at least 3 games in today's landscape, but they start vs Okie State and then travel to Hawaii before finishing OOC vs Cal Poly. Their Pac 12 schedule is a tough one as well. The three best teams on their schedule (Washington, Utah and Stanford) are all home games and surefire losses, and they travel to Washington State and Oregon. They should be heavy underdogs vs everyone on their schedule except Cal Poly.
Click to expand...
It's a brutal schedule. They play Pac 5 road games and avoid us and USC. What is their most winnable Pac12 home game? ASU? Stanford? They may be better this year, but I'd take the under.
 
Last edited:
J.R. Ewing said:
It's a brutal schedule. They play 5 road games and avoid us and USC. What is their most winnable Pac12 home game? ASU? Stanford? They may be better this year, but I'd take the under.
Click to expand...
The key for them hitting the Over is beating Hawaii and only needing one Pac 12 win (assuming they beat Cal Poly). Can anyone really see two Pac 12 wins for them, even if they get a fluky one?
 
TSchekler said:
The key for them hitting the Over is beating Hawaii and only needing one Pac 12 win (assuming they beat Cal Poly). Can anyone really see two Pac 12 wins for them, even if they get a fluky one?
Click to expand...
I read through Hawaii's preview and I think they're going to be substantially better than last year.
 
Limon Jack said:
Pac-12

  • Washington: 9.5 (Over -124, Under -124)
  • Oregon: 9 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Utah: 9 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • Washington State 8.5 (Over +102, Under -120)
  • Arizona State: 7.5 (Over +125, Under -145)
  • Arizona: 7 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Stanford: 6.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • USC: 6.5 (Over -114, Under -102)
  • Cal: 6 (Over -102, Under -114)
  • UCLA: 5.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Colorado: 4.5 (Over -108, Under -108)
  • Oregon State: 2.5 (Over +130, Under -155)

(Source - FanDuel)

CU Non Con:

Colorado State - 3.5
Nebraska - 8.5
Air Force - 6.5
Click to expand...

The nubs drew a pretty easy Big Ten schedule. 4 conf road games. Drew Ohio St, Indiana, Maryland out of the East. Wisconsin, Iowa, NW all at home.
 
OVER, probably the best bet in the PAC-12
I am not that high on UCLA, CAL, Arizona State, Washington State
Tucker is not the same ole, same ole! He wants to bitch slap everyone, with a smile on his face.
 
i would stay away from betting Chip. he could go either way......mail it in fat guy or magical Chip. either way, UCLA hasn't ever been very good. one of the most overrated programs ever.

i would never bet on the arizona schools......but i might bet against kevin sumlin. he's mediocre at best. sumlin has maybe earned the Houston job.....he sucked at ATM, and he's sucking now at U of A. guy inherited art briles guys at UH and had some fluke with manziel. it's all bs about him being oc at OU. with bradford and adrian peterson.....that was kevin wilson. sumlin was basically wr coach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top