What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Search results

  1. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    This was asked to show how weird the selection criteria and thinking that's been displayed here. Do you realize how ludicrous it would be if CU turned down the OU AD given our respective programs? It's a rhetorical question. Of course we hire him. That posters are saying NO and MAYBE points...
  2. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    I asked a simple, reasonable question and I got back a novel that basically boiled down to "no, I wouldn't hire the OU AD for CU". So far that's: Yes - 0 No - 1 Maybe - 1
  3. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    I've got a waffle cone for the non-decision maker, waffle cone... who wants it? Oh here you go.
  4. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    Did someone order waffles with a side of waffles?
  5. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    If you're the decision maker and Mullens calls you today, May 30th 2013, and says I want the job, what do you say?
  6. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    Listen, I'm not the soup nazi. I'd prefer someone who comes from a great football program, but I'm open to hearing from great candidates. If they can demonstrate success in other ways that are impressive (like managing a huge college budget like UK, during a time when success was had on the...
  7. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    Mullens calls and your answer is maybe. Anyone else?
  8. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    This is where you're confused. Kentucky going from bad to 8-5 in the SEC isn't mediocre. It's great relative to who they are. You cannot understand that for some reason. Frankly, it would be great for CU if we went 8-5 right now. You can't keep cutting down every program that is not CU. I...
  9. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    I asked a simple question. If Mullens is interested in the CU AD position today, do you hire him? Only one person answered.
  10. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    If you're going to keep throwing a million questions at me, this is going to go on and on. Why credit Mullens? 1. He retained Chip Kelley at OU for the first 3 years of his tenure. Kelley had a TON of opportunities to leave, and Mullens kept him at OU for as long as he could. 2. He's been...
  11. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    I'm well aware of every schools historical FB performance. I wouldn't make a decision based on that. Recent incremental year-over-year success is a better indicator. Re: Vandy, they have made strides the last 2 years vs. prior performance, but it's not enough to warrant a lateral or AD promotion...
  12. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    I missed it, no offense. I'd say what has Vandy done in FB & MBB lately to make this a good hire, and the answer better be great. Have they made significant incremental strides year over year on-and-off the field? Show me their progress under this AD.
  13. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    I'm streamlining the discussion. This way is quicker.
  14. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    Haha, which one, the one where you insinuated Bill Belichick wouldn't be a good AD? I thought that was the best question in this thread.
  15. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    It's come down to that question. Sink has mentioned he doesn't know the inner workings of the OU AD, but he's really confident about the jury still being out on him. So a final question, if CU gets a chance to hire Mullens today, do we do it or not?
  16. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    Reminder, this is coming from someone who was saying Bohn was qualified for the CU AD in 2005. How did that turn out? Another way of saying your judgement so far has been extraordinary, so of course you're right about Mullens... One last question. If Mullens is interested in the CU AD position...
  17. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    In the last 3 years at Oregon, Mullens has been hiding under a desk hoping no one realizes he's yet to accomplish anything worthwhile, and his lack of accomplishments are directly in conjunction with the athletic department is reaching the top in several sports. Furthermore, the AD position as...
  18. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    You can't even admit Mullens is good present day. You think the jury is still out. He's been at Oregon for 3 years. The last 3 years at Oregon have been overwhelmingly successful.
  19. Mike Bohn replacment qualifications discussion

    Yep. Listing the obvious names was a Ringo-like move.
Back
Top