Maybe TTU was his first offer?What's he referring to re Chev?
Maybe TTU was his first offer?What's he referring to re Chev?
Would they take 2 in 18? He would be my first choice.This thread is why see no reason to take 2 RBs in 2017. Get this kid and he plays early.
Because you have a cap on schollies? That being said, really good RB's should have been playing both ways and have experience at LB or Safety, so if you think both can contribute to your team one way or another, then yes.I think that if there are two highly ranked RB's you take both, why not? It's not like we've had that luxury in the recent years. RB's are more prone to injury as well. Why not double down.
For anyone questioning taking multiple backs in consecutive years, let's just look at too schoola right now. Some teams are going 4 and five deep with highly rated backs, so there's no reason we shouldn't be looking to bring in 4 or 5 talented kids at the position every couple years.
You get to 4-5 deep by taking 1 per year, if you're not experiencing attrition. We lost Carr, but we still have 4-5 guys.For anyone questioning taking multiple backs in consecutive years, let's just look at too schoola right now. Some teams are going 4 and five deep with highly rated backs, so there's no reason we shouldn't be looking to bring in 4 or 5 talented kids at the position every couple years.
Pretty sure Bama and SC have had years where they took more than one 5* back in the same class. You can take multiple kids at running back and should if you can.You get to 4-5 deep by taking 1 per year, if you're not experiencing attrition. We lost Carr, but we still have 4-5 guys.
I think the issue is more getting a talent injection. We lost Carr. Bisharat doesn't look like a RB to me. The kid coming in from Texas didn't blow up like I thought he would despite tons of exposure and carries. Bottom line, the kid who this thread is about would have a chance to be the man.
Sure - every school has. Lots of attrition at the position, partly due to injury.Pretty sure Bama and SC have had years where they took more than one 5* back in the same class. You can take multiple kids at running back and should if you can.
It's like saying we don't have room for Moretti in this class..I'm amazed that anyone is saying we don't need a 4* or 5* prospect with 40 + offers.
I'm amazed that anyone is saying we don't need a 4* or 5* prospect with 40 + offers.
I don't want to say that some fans are idots... but some fans are idots.
I don't know if anyone is discussing that. The question was framed more like should we take extra RBs right now, as our depth is low right now. Just don't take kids who become JAGs if this stud commits.Wait. Why are we discussing whether or not we would accept this kid in the 2018 class that has 3 kids committed, none of which are RBs?
Wait. Why are we discussing whether or not we would accept this kid in the 2018 class that has 3 kids committed, none of which are RBs?