I wonder where he will land......
Maybe Tad will have an opening? (I kid)I wonder where he will land......
I won't be crying for him. Never liked the guy.
Didn't they just beat Duke?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UNC as well this year. Only reason he got the 4th year this year was because Wellman and him go back. Like Nik said, Dino led them to a decent amount success and he took them back a few steps.Didn't they just beat Duke?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have no issues with Bz. I think he was the necessary, positive transition from crappy basketball to what we have now. Bz, unlike Hawkins or Embree, improved CU while he was here and began setting conditions for the success of Tad. Correct me if I am wrong (no issue with that on AB) but wasn't Bz's contract part of what began the basketball facility improvement effort, and his recruitment of Alec Burkes didn't hurt either.
I hope he finds success in his next gig if that is what happens.
Great post.I have no issues with Bz. I think he was the necessary, positive transition from crappy basketball to what we have now. Bz, unlike Hawkins or Embree, improved CU while he was here and began setting conditions for the success of Tad. Correct me if I am wrong (no issue with that on AB) but wasn't Bz's contract part of what began the basketball facility improvement effort, and his recruitment of Alec Burkes didn't hurt either.
I hope he finds success in his next gig if that is what happens.
Great post.
It pretty much happened in perfect order. They needed the reputable coach in Bzdelik to get the facilities done and lay the groundwork. You're right it was Bzdelik who insisted in the facilities being in his contract, which he ultimately had to "pay" for, barely as ground was just broken before he left. But Tad took this team to the next level. I'm happy it happened this way. That's not to say Bzdelik wouldn't have achieved the success that Tad has, but it's harder to see what's happened here, happening if Bzdelik had stayed. He always had one step out the door. Timing is everything and as the SI article pointed out if Bzdelik had left one year earlier, it's unlikely Tad would've gotten hired given his record at UNC.
Buzz managed to implement a change in the players to the point that they at least started to expect to win some games against decent programs. He brought in some better recruits than we had been getting to upgrade the roster. He also as mentiond brought in Burks although I doubt he or anyone else ever imagined how he would develop.
Another thing Buzz did was concentrate on improving our team FT %, which had consistently been atrocious under Ricardo, and the improvement for which has largely carried over under Tad. As inconsistent and frustrating as it is now for some of our guys outside of Ski, Josh, and Spence when healthy, it is still much better than in those days.
I mean don't I blame him for looking around, not really. But I like the fact Tad appears to want to be here. Do I think he could leave at some point, sure. Also, if we had to replace Tad, which I don't want to obviously, I think we'd be in a better position to get a quality coach. (At the time, I didn't think of Tad as some kind of savior).With where we were at when Buzz cam in almost any decent coach would have been keeping an eye out for a better situation. Our facilities were bad, our attendance sucked, we were known as a doormat, and we had no tradition to build on, little loyalty in the state and a lousy recruiting base. For most coaches not named Tad Colorado was a place to hopefully win enough games to catch someones attention before it fell apart again.
Buzz managed to implement a change in the players to the point that they at least started to expect to win some games against decent programs. He brought in some better recruits than we had been getting to upgrade the roster. He also as mentiond brought in Burks although I doubt he or anyone else ever imagined how he would develop.
It's a good point that had the change happened the year before Tad would have not likely recieved much consideration. You can also wonder if had it happened a year later if Tad would still be available, or if his team would have dropped off enough without their senior floor leader to take him out of consideration again.
I mean don't I blame him for looking around, not really. But I like the fact Tad appears to want to be here. Do I think he could leave at some point, sure. Also, if we had to replace Tad, which I don't want to obviously, I think we'd be in a better position to get a quality coach. (At the time, I didn't think of Tad as some kind of savior).
Agreed plus if KU were ever to come calling, that would likely be a "good problem." I doubt they want someone who has never made it out of hte first weekend. Plus, he doesn't seem the type that wants to uproot his family. He's experienced the nomadic coaching lifestyle and I'm sure he loves have some stability which isn't afforded to many coaches. If he wanted more money, he could've gone to Nebraska or A&M, and cost of living in those places isn't as high.As Tad keeps winning I see the list of schools he would consider leaving for getting smaller and smaller.
He and his wife love living and working in Colorado. If he can have a competive income coaching a team that can go to the tourney every year with a chance to go deep, play in a home arena with a strong, supportive crowd, and have decent support from the administration it would take a lot more than that to get him to leave, especially since he has proven that he is a guy who isn't all about the money and fame.
One of the most important thing Buzz did was change the culture around the program in terms of academics. We were an APR nightmare. Now we're consistently in the high 900s and I think we even pulled a perfect 1,000 one year. Quite a recovery from the scholarship penalty situation the program was in.
I didn't realize how bad we were off the court. Always good to have a program that succeeds in both ways.One of the most important thing Buzz did was change the culture around the program in terms of academics. We were an APR nightmare. Now we're consistently in the high 900s and I think we even pulled a perfect 1,000 one year. Quite a recovery from the scholarship penalty situation the program was in.
You don't really hear much about character issues with these guys which a good thing. That's not to say, they're all choir boys.Good point. I'd also add that we didn't have any disciplinary (or worse, criminal) problems under Buzz that I can recall, and that seems to be the case under Tad as well. Not that it was a real problem under Patton either ... by and large he recruited good kids. But I seem to recall we had at least one allegation of a sexual assault during his tenure ... don't recall what came of it (if anything).
Hey! I'm important! A friend ran into Bz and his kid at the golf course. Said he was an ahole, so it has to be true.He would dislike you too.... if you were important enough for him to know who you are.
Hey! I'm important! A friend ran into Bz and his kid at the golf course. Said he was an ahole, so it has to be true.
Good point. I'd also add that we didn't have any disciplinary (or worse, criminal) problems under Buzz that I can recall, and that seems to be the case under Tad as well. Not that it was a real problem under Patton either ... by and large he recruited good kids. But I seem to recall we had at least one allegation of a sexual assault during his tenure ... don't recall what came of it (if anything).
Hey, now. Say what you want about Bzdelik but it's a TOS violation to call his kid an asshole.
I have no issues with Bz. I think he was the necessary, positive transition from crappy basketball to what we have now. Bz, unlike Hawkins or Embree, improved CU while he was here and began setting conditions for the success of Tad. Correct me if I am wrong (no issue with that on AB) but wasn't Bz's contract part of what began the basketball facility improvement effort, and his recruitment of Alec Burkes didn't hurt either.
I hope he finds success in his next gig if that is what happens.