What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Could this have worked out any better for CU?

Nobody knows for sure. If you're talking about TV deals, I suspect that Big 10 games get higher ratings than Pac 10 games, but don't know for sure. There could be any number of reasons for that: culture, time slots, etc.

If you're talking about a Pac 12 network, I think it would likely make similar money. The big football games are still on the networks and the conference network gets the lesser matchups. Also, the Pac 12 will have more interesting content than the Big 10, baseball, volleyball, etc.

The real reason the Pac 12 will be better off than the Big 12 is because the Big 12 will never have its own network--because Texas won't share and will demand its own network. Thus, the rest of the Big 12 will forever be at a disadvantage to the conferences with network ownership.

That alone shows the massive difference in the revenue potential for both conferences. More network revenue in 12 Pac = more money for everybody vs More network revenue in Big 12(10) = more money for Texas + table scraps for everybody else.
 
Back
Top