1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Future of football series vs CSU

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by cmgoods, Feb 4, 2015.

  1. cmgoods

    cmgoods Olympic Sports Mod Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    791
    [tweet]563091604727406592[/tweet]

    [tweet]563092204936519683[/tweet]
     
  2. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,597
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    RG strikes again. Boss. Finally our AD isn't a giant puss when it comes to scheduling
     
  3. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    58,967
    Likes Received:
    6,084
    Must have barely had enough attendance to prevent a cancellation of the series. Damn.
     
  4. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,597
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    I like RG not so subtly calling out CSU. We have all the negotiating power here
     
  5. Liver

    Liver modded mod Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,247
    Likes Received:
    3,022
    i am sure that once the sheep have their shiny new stadium built, the series will continue on campus. their attendance in the fancy new stadium should support it, right?

    right?

    right?
     
  6. patebuff

    patebuff Downgraded to half a star Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,601
    Likes Received:
    1,438
    It's nice to have a good AD
     
  7. CVilleBuff

    CVilleBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    19,595
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Nice move by RG!
     
  8. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    58,967
    Likes Received:
    6,084
    Yup. Get the discussion going publicly. I like him.
     
  9. SerenityBuff

    SerenityBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2014
    Messages:
    1,338
    Likes Received:
    1,752
    Play it on campus or shut it down. We don't owe the sheep *****.
     
  10. buff4bcs1985

    buff4bcs1985 Hail to the King Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    26,423
    Likes Received:
    2,549
    Rocky Mountain Showdown unlikely to be renewed!!!!

    Rick George For President!

    [tweet]563091604727406592[/tweet]
     
  11. buff4bcs1985

    buff4bcs1985 Hail to the King Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    26,423
    Likes Received:
    2,549
    merge my thread haha Sorry CM!
     
  12. cmgoods

    cmgoods Olympic Sports Mod Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    791
    you're a few minutes late on this
     
  13. Tea Rex

    Tea Rex Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,514
    Likes Received:
    221
    Good.
     
  14. DiggerBuffs

    DiggerBuffs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Messages:
    1,180
    Likes Received:
    288
    Wow, another reason to get excited today. Now hiring Seto would put me over the edge and I may need to visit Target for new boxer briefs or at least go commando.
     
  15. J.R. Ewing

    J.R. Ewing Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    14,219
    Likes Received:
    3,998
    Excellent. This game had zero upside for CU.
     
  16. tante

    tante Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    25,996
    Likes Received:
    1,535
    [MENTION=735]absinthe[/MENTION]

    maybe we can get an official allbuffs response to the tweet in approval.
     
  17. Burrito Palazzo

    Burrito Palazzo AnalExplosionDeathMatch Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    32,799
    Likes Received:
    5,161
    Die, Bart, die!
     
  18. ramfan

    ramfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    108
    Disappointing, as a CSU fan, if that ends up being the case. I can understand some of the reasons why CU (the program/the fans) wouldn't be interested in this game continuing as-is. I can admit that, outside of the pure financials (CU makes good money off this game too - especially when they are good/relevant), CSU has more to gain by playing the game. I would definitely prefer they move the series back to campuses once CSU new stadium is ready. I'd even be willing to concede letting CU play at home and CSU play their home games in Denver until that can happen.
     
    buff4bcs1985 likes this.
  19. MtnBuff

    MtnBuff Not allowed in Barzil 2 Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    28,149
    Likes Received:
    2,954
    A fair guess is that CSU wanted to either keep some games in Denver and/or have an even split home and home on campus.

    If I am RG the least I settle for is a 2 for 1, CSU now thinks they are big time, let them fill their new stadium without a CU game to remind their fans that they have a team.

    Best just to kill it.
     
  20. Quattro

    Quattro Banned BANNED Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    26,503
    Likes Received:
    762
    Nah, you can come to Boulder and play us. No damn reason to play CSU outside of Boulder, ever.

    Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
     
  21. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    49,761
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    I think RG has heard enough from the fans that they are sick of playing this game in Denver. He did what any good AD would do in his position, which is to see if there was a way he could amend the existing contract. He was told "no". So in response, the series ends once this contract is done. CSU had to know that would likely be the case and they didn't budge. So be it. Enjoy the last four years of the series, goats.
     
  22. J.R. Ewing

    J.R. Ewing Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    14,219
    Likes Received:
    3,998
    Why would you even consider renewing it?

    The he game has zero upside for CU. Zero.
     
  23. SuperiorBuff

    SuperiorBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,069
    Likes Received:
    1,284
    End the series. On campus or off, end it.
     
  24. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,597
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    We should force them to play us in Hughes in 2020 like the contract stipulates. That's be amazing (I still can't believe we're playing them in FoCo, and now in the last year of the series)
     
  25. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    49,761
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    I get the impression from RG that had they agreed to take the game out of Denver now, he would have been willing to continue the series past it's current expiration.

    I wouldn't have minded a 2-1 on rotating campuses. But CSU seems to think they're something special these days and decided to play hardball. OK, fine. Have it your way. Have fun playing Weber State in front of 10,000 rabid fans on opening day, 2021.
     
  26. SuperiorBuff

    SuperiorBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,069
    Likes Received:
    1,284
    I've been posting for over a decade that this is a no win game for CU and should be discontinued altogether.
     
  27. ramfan

    ramfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    108
    This is meant to be a legitimate point, not purely inflammatory. While a 2-1 gets CSU a solid home game every 3 years there is no doubt CSU could schedule far more interesting road opponents if that was what had to happen. CU is far better off conference/historical/money-wise, I completely acknowledge that, but at present most arguments you could make about one team you could make about the other as well. Maybe we are both getting a little big for ourselves? Or maybe both just need to move on.
     
    hokiehead likes this.
  28. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    58,967
    Likes Received:
    6,084
    Uhh, what?

    CU needs this to be a 2 for 1 at the very least due to the 9 game conf schedule and both of the 2 have to be at home. Just have to be. That's the bottom line. If CSU doesn't like that, then CU will go elsewhere. Everything else is dross. The extension by Bohn was so, so, SO dumb.

    Outside of that overriding point. We gain minimal extra money from the game compared to Folsom. This series is a huge win for CSU financially.

    Would we make a little less money? Sure, but the scheduling flexibility is more than worth it. ANd with the new renovations to Folsom, maybe that money difference really shrinks.

    Then there is the on field benefits, which are meh. Let CSU play in their sandbox, and CU in ours.
     
  29. SD Buff

    SD Buff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    344
    I think it's fantastic you guys can schedule far better 2 for 1s. I don't disagree. Stoked you'll have that opportunity

    from phone
     
  30. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    49,761
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    Really?

    Like who? Nebraska? Forget any Pac 12 schools. They have all the same issues we have with a 9-game conference schedule. In fact, I think the B1G plays a 9 game conference schedule too. So forget Nebraska. Who else? Is CSU going to magically travel 4,000+ to an away game?
     

Share This Page