What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Larry Scott talks to Pac-10 Coaches about Expansion

superdeluxe

Member
Pretty good read from ESPN today:

http://espn.go.com/blog/pac10/post/...c-10-coaches-in-on-expansion-or-not-scenarios

"Not really at liberty to talk about what those [expansion scenarios] are," Harbaugh said.

For the the most part, conference coaches seem, to borrow a term from Washington coach Steve Sarkisian, "neutral" on expansion. There also seems to be a general feeling of confidence that Scott and the administrators and consultants looking into the matter ultimately will make the right decision. The right decision, of course, meaning one that makes every conference program richer.

"I like our conference. I like the natural rivalries we have. I like the fact we play everybody in our conference and a true champion comes out of it," Sarkisian said. "But if there is value in expansion, if Larry Scott and his team -- who do a great job -- if they deem it's the best thing for our conference, then I'm all for it. If we do it, I know it will be the right thing to do because of the time and effort they're putting into this. And if we don't, I'll have faith that was the right thing to do. Either way they go with it, that's why they hired him and they'll make a good decision."

Said Harbaugh: "Is [expansion] a good thing? What we got right now is a good thing. It's set up really well. But our conference is going to look at all possible options. You've got to be open because you don't know what the landscape of college football will look like in two to five years. I think the Pac-10 is being proactive."

What about a conference title game, with or without expansion?

"I think that would be great, would be great for our conference," Sarkisian said. "I know for our kids, they love playing football. So if they give them another chance to play a game, they'll play it. I'm sure that's how it would be for the other nine programs in our conference. Just from an exposure standpoint for our conference, I think it would be a good thing."

Scott has significantly restructured the conference office since he took over last summer, including hiring deputy commissioner/chief operating officer Kevin Weiberg (the former Big 12 commissioner), chief financial officer Ron McQuate, chief marketing officer Danette Leighton and senior associate commissioner/SWA Gloria Nevarez.

Scott also has retained retained the Creative Artists Agency, the global marketing and entertainment firm, to explore expansion possibilities, according to a report from Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.

With all the new faces and agenda items, the meeting, in large part, functioned as a "getting to know you" session.

If you hire the CAA, you are not messing around.
 
Pretty good read from ESPN today:

http://espn.go.com/blog/pac10/post/...c-10-coaches-in-on-expansion-or-not-scenarios



If you hire the CAA, you are not messing around.

actually, i think it demonstrates a serious lack of focus to hire a bunch of self-involved hollywood pukes to have anything to do with expansion, other than maybe get a read from the networks on what a new tv package would be worth with an expanded conf. and ccg.

but, that's just me and i am biased.
 
actually, i think it demonstrates a serious lack of focus to hire a bunch of self-involved hollywood pukes to have anything to do with expansion, other than maybe get a read from the networks on what a new tv package would be worth with an expanded conf. and ccg.

but, that's just me and i am biased.

CAA is more than just "hollywood pukes".

The exact firm they hired is CAA Media Ventures. They are the same firm representing the U.S. Olympics in getting bids on their media rights.

The guy that runs it is the guy who founded College Sports TV, before selling it off.
 
CAA is more than just "hollywood pukes".

The exact firm they hired is CAA Media Ventures. They are the same firm representing the U.S. Olympics in getting bids on their media rights.

The guy that runs it is the guy who founded College Sports TV, before selling it off.

yeah, i am familiar with them. opinions are like a-holes. everyone has one.
 
Back
Top