AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Mark Kennedy new, but soon to be old CU President - Official CU president Thread
- Thread starter buff4bcs1985
- Start date
Because the original posts we’re more concerned with the impact of a new president on the athletic department. It wandered from there.
DrunkRalphie
Well-Known Member
Not a ringing endorsement when North Dakota of all places couldn't get rid of him fast enough.
.DrunkRalphie
Well-Known Member
Me too.
I would rather they spent that money on assistant coach salaries for CU football
Deleted member 807
Guest
Cus we don’t really know if Kennedy is athletic friendly and we want Rick George to have nice things.
****ing unreal. I can’t imagine a move from ND costing any more than half that.
Real failure on the part of the BOR.
1. Anytime you have a straight party line vote it means that the regents (on both sides in most cases) are working from a political standpoint, not in the interest of the university.
2. A significantly split vote like this one means that the candidate is both political and is not qualified enough to draw support from a variety of viewpoints. Starting this way makes it hard to see him being successful doing the necessary work with the state legislature and with the diverse members of those who influence in the world of business, media, academia, etc.
3. What have we heard about this candidate (now president) that says he is outstanding at anything. A person in line for this kind of job should be a standout at something. Even his supporters have not been able to tell us what he brings to the table that makes him special, unique, innovative, or otherwise worthy of heading one of the nations top university systems. Even those who opposed Benson admitted that he was successful at business and was a leader in his field.
4. If he was such a good candidate why didn't he have intermediate stops between UND and CU? Who else wanted him.
This is not about his political affiliation. I prefer people from the conservative side of politics and had the candidate been in similar circumstances run through by a Democratic majority made the same criticisms. Colorado has one flagship university system (sorry sheep, you guys ain't it) and that system should be run in a way that serves and represents the entire state in a non-partisan manner that brings value to the entire state regardless of political leanings.
This hire doesn't look to come close to meeting that standard.
1. Anytime you have a straight party line vote it means that the regents (on both sides in most cases) are working from a political standpoint, not in the interest of the university.
2. A significantly split vote like this one means that the candidate is both political and is not qualified enough to draw support from a variety of viewpoints. Starting this way makes it hard to see him being successful doing the necessary work with the state legislature and with the diverse members of those who influence in the world of business, media, academia, etc.
3. What have we heard about this candidate (now president) that says he is outstanding at anything. A person in line for this kind of job should be a standout at something. Even his supporters have not been able to tell us what he brings to the table that makes him special, unique, innovative, or otherwise worthy of heading one of the nations top university systems. Even those who opposed Benson admitted that he was successful at business and was a leader in his field.
4. If he was such a good candidate why didn't he have intermediate stops between UND and CU? Who else wanted him.
This is not about his political affiliation. I prefer people from the conservative side of politics and had the candidate been in similar circumstances run through by a Democratic majority made the same criticisms. Colorado has one flagship university system (sorry sheep, you guys ain't it) and that system should be run in a way that serves and represents the entire state in a non-partisan manner that brings value to the entire state regardless of political leanings.
This hire doesn't look to come close to meeting that standard.
15k annually for your car is bound to get you something real nice, too.
Also why couldn’t he provide any examples of “moving us into the 21st century” in any of the open forums? He basically said he will be really hands off.
Bliff Cranch
Well-Known Member
And so it begins...
Or is that continues?....
Or is that continues?....
I have no idea what that means either.....
DrunkRalphie
Well-Known Member
You could get yourself in trouble with stuff like this. I'd tone it down.
This is some bull****. If something happened and authorities wanted to hunt me down, I’m fine with that. Those regents ****ed us. There needs to be repercussions.
SuperiorBuff
Well-Known Member
Our nephew got a $60,000 moving allowance from Walmart to move from Denver to Tucson.
Is Walmart Denver super excited to get rid of him and Tucson Walmart wondering wtf they did wrong to get him?
Yes. He moved to Tucson. He should have gotten more