I want them to do well. But man, last couple of years...
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Post-Spring Depth Chart
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
I think the corners are solid, maybe even good... but they're not going to look good if the opposing QB can stand in the pocket clean for 5+ seconds.
True
Plus if the offense can't stay on the field and ToP gets skewed, even a good D will look like **** in the second half.
Corners will be solid.
Mac's been coaching the corners this spring. He really loves to coach and/or sees a need he can fill better. Either way, I expect good things from them. But as stated by others, if the DL sucks again this year and we give Mannion et al too much time, we're screwed.
Corners always scare me. In '01 we had some decent backfield but we still got torched by the Ducks in the Fiesta Bowl. And when we had "lockdown" corners Smith and Brown, we got torched on a routine basis. I don't know what it is about Colorado, but it doesn't seem to matter how good our corners are.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So nothing that is relevant to this coming season?
Buffenuf
massive tool
Injury.
Not a bad guess.
I've got something else I'm hoping for, but I don't want to jinx it.
Lewis or C*******n?
Transfer OL has to sit out a year regardless
Munyer's not gonna be C
You mis-read that. He had OG-Munyer and C-Crabb.
Not counting on Weifels until we see him pads on the field but if he can win a starting G spot it would be huge in terms of meaning that we have a much more solid starting inside OL. It would also mean that with Kelley who I am thinking of as a starting C without him we have something resembling depth for a change.
Alex Kelley had a very good spring and he's a very good kid.
Irwin has a lot of work in front of him as he hasn't squatted in like 8 months or something. Color me concerned.
Irwin has a lot of work in front of him as he hasn't squatted in like 8 months or something. Color me concerned.
Yep. He also hasn't practiced in... 1.5 years? It is interesting that the staff is basically penciling him in as #1 LT.
http://msn.foxsports.com/college-fo...d-jake-mcgee-to-graduate-then-transfer-042514
Wasn't sure where to post this, and have no reason to think there is a connection to CU, but an experienced tight end who caught 43 balls last year would be a nice addition.
Wasn't sure where to post this, and have no reason to think there is a connection to CU, but an experienced tight end who caught 43 balls last year would be a nice addition.
aik
Well-Known Member
CVille, what's the word?
If we could somehow get a transfer of this caliber, I am starting to like our chances on offense more. I would think if their is one or two positions this staff is looking for transfers it is TE and the OL.
who will be returning kicks? is Spruce solidified at punt return?
I don't know HCMM's tendencies -- will he use starters at those positions? no surprise coming from a Hokie, but I think taking those kinds of chances and putting focus on special teams for rebuilding situations makes a lot of sense.
I don't know HCMM's tendencies -- will he use starters at those positions? no surprise coming from a Hokie, but I think taking those kinds of chances and putting focus on special teams for rebuilding situations makes a lot of sense.