Maybe so. But if their offense is below average, what does that make our defense?
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Stanford -28
- Thread starter Jens1893
- Start date
Maybe so. But if their offense is below average, what does that make our defense?
Except that EVERY team that Colorado plays can score on Colorado. We are averaging 46 points given up per game this year, and that includes playing teams like Fresno, CSU, Sac State, and WSU.
SuperiorBuff
Well-Known Member
Our defense couldn't cover a room in darkness if they had their hand on the light switch.
We're now one of the focal points of the weekly picks. :sad1:
Covering or not is irrelevant. Score 20 versus the Buffs and you win. Our O is impotent. Stanford's D is impressive. Comparisons to the Wazzu game ignore the fact Pirate Mikey wised up and went back to Tuel who did not play against CU. If he had, we could very well be 0-8.
Deleted member 807
Guest
Gotta go with the team that recruited better, is smarter, has boosters with deeper pockets, and an administration that backs both athletic success and academic excellence.
DrunkPanda
Well-Known Member
pffft. let Stanford keep their football success. I'd much rather have a school with CU's academic reputation than one that is a football factory like Stanford.
disclaimer: for people that don't understand sarcasm, this post was not serious. Besides, I literally would rather CU turn into a football factory than the current garbage we have right now
At least it was on target , too bad it was the wrong team.
And the guy was unquestionably open.
I'm starting to think that the lines they post for our games is the halftime spread.
BuffaloChuck
Member
Exactly!
This is the game-reason I'd never place bets on games. After seeing Stanford stumble and fumble around all season long, I thought this would be a 10-20 point victory-margin. I was even thinking this would be a 24-14 game, perhaps. I assumed Embree & Co would design a game-plan to score points.
Just like CU Football's done at home for the prior 26 years.
I had no idea Embree would do otherwise.
This team is head scratcher for Vegas. I'm guessing they'll use a multiplier next week.