I remember rolling my eyes.I remember worrying he was going Kansas.
I'm not a technical expert on hoops by any means, but i see ths as one of Boyle's failings, not a strength. I feel that I rarely see the Buffs run scripted plays (comparing primarily to Wisconsin and VT).I think Tad is an exceptional leader of young men and a very good x's & o's coach.
.
Agree - as a fairly casual observer the long scoring droughts, dramatically inconsistent play on both ends, and collapses with a significant lead look more like coaching deficiencies than player ability. Just my impression.I'm not a technical expert on hoops by any means, but i see ths as one of Boyle's failings, not a strength. I feel that I rarely see the Buffs run scripted plays (comparing primarily to Wisconsin and VT).
They have been very unfortunate with injuries and they are still very young. Ease up. Tad is easily the best coach at CU in 4 decades. He does need to improve. Next year Walton will return, the freshmen will get experience and Bey and Kin will have another year.
I remember worrying he was going Kansas.
Tad is easily the best coach at CU in 4 decades.
that's a pretty low bar
Point 1, Ceal doesn't do the contracts. The only signatures are the AD (Rick George), The Chancellor (Phil), and the coach. Point 2, The extensions are only automatic if both parties agree, i.e. if Rick decides he doesn't want the extension to happen, he notifies that person in writing.uncomfortable with the process of how ceal builds into basketball contracts automatic extensions
initial contract gives coach some security
if they can't perform why automatic extensions
idea that boyle, lappe, and payne all got automatic extensions when couldn't compete in conf never made sense
what is risk of letting a non-competitive coach walk?
why does ceal leave cu in position to have payoff fired coaches with three years of automatic extensions on their contracts?
boyle has ONE winning season of conference games in past five years
yet five automatic extensions
payne received automatic extension midway into 1st season going 5-13 in conf
why can't extensions be to reward actually winning games that matter - in conf
Point 1, Ceal doesn't do the contracts. The only signatures are the AD (Rick George), The Chancellor (Phil), and the coach. Point 2, The extensions are only automatic if both parties agree, i.e. if Rick decides he doesn't want the extension to happen, he notifies that person in writing.
Why do you type like that?doesn't negotiate with coach or representatives
isn't principal hiring consulting firms to determine comparative salary bands
or isn't a signor on the paper contract?
question to ask is:
if tad were to be let go, who (realistically)
could the buffs get that could move this program forward
seems to me peeps are in two camps
program dysfunctional before (keep boyle group)
program not improving (replace boyle group)
fair to acknowledge what boyle did to program
but is it fair to acknowledge that boyle hit his limit as recruiter and coach?
yes it could go back to old days
but it also could propel buffs to new glory days too
are we afraid of success, or afraid to try for success?
answer unfortunately probably has more to do with football payoffs than boyle's potential
Looking at the schedule.....I see the Buffs finishing 6-12....splitting this weekend...splitting on Washington trip....splitting at home against USC and UCLA...swept on road against same. Splitting at home against Arizona and ASU....losing at home to Utah(who is improving each week...they had a brutal preseason schedule)---Thoughts?
Okay. I watched most of last night’s game and it was the first game I’ve watched in a few years, so there’s that caveat up front. Ridicule me appropriately, but here’s my uninformed take.
CU is limited talent-wise. M Wright is talented and Bey has potential. Who is this Siewert guy? Laughably awful. Physically, they either look skinny or doughy. No one is imposing. Offensively, they are erratic and reckless. Pretty much a mess possession to possession. They look like they’re playing a pickup game. Defensively, they play okay in stretches then lose their collective minds.
Neither team last night was any good. A conference game between middling opponents. Awful basketball. It’s little wonder the venue was mostly empty.
He was awful.Lucas Siewert is a career 42.5% 3 point shooter. The mechanics of his jumper is super simple which makes it unlikely to ever become broken. He’s also 6’10 and used to living in a foreign country. Dudes like that get paid in Europe or China until their late 30s and oftentimes tax-free. Now, factor in the current/future growth of basketball internationally and the stupid amount of money China has been throwing around to boost their pro leagues.
He could be able to retire before he’s 35 essentially for shooting 3’s. Do you feel appropriately ridiculed?
Tad Boyle is an average coach at best. To argue that he is better than what we had before is a very low bar - Ricardo Patton was the only coach with a winning record over that period of time (last 4 decades). Boyle is probably a little better than Patton.
But I also don't agree that you fire a coach to get a different voice - you need a better goal than that. CU ADs have not focused on MBB as long as I can remember. If you are going to fire Boyle you better develop and commit to a plan that makes CU basketball better. Take a hard look at recruiting and what can the program do to improve recruiting. What can they do to increase fan support? etc. I think it is a bigger task than just replacing the coach.
If you are going to put the resources to basketball, why not see what Tad can do with a top four budget. Let me put it this way, he has probably been #10 in resources and on average finished +4 or +5 from that spot nearly every year (this means he finishes around 5th or 6th in conference). So why not see if he can consistently finish top four. He has already proven he can do more with less.