What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Rankings of CU's MBB Recruiting Class

Buffnik

Real name isn't Nik
Club Member
Junta Member
Rivals: #27
Scout: #21
ESPN: #22
MaxPreps: #15

Arizona and UCLA are generally considered to have the #2 and #3 classes in the country, respectively. Oregon's also got a nice class that comes in around #30-35. Stanford's just behind them.
 
How does the basketball rankings count? Do they just use the top 5 prospects kinda like with football (top 20)? Methinks our rating is helped out considerably by having 6 signees
 
Wow. Never thot I'd ever see CU bball recruit rankings up in that rare air.

This whole thing just keeps gettin' better and better.
 
How does the basketball rankings count? Do they just use the top 5 prospects kinda like with football (top 20)? Methinks our rating is helped out considerably by having 6 signees

Most seem to care most about the top 2 or 3 guys in the class. Quality matters much more than quantity. Frankly, our rating hasn't changed much since we got the early commitments from Scott and Gordon. Xavier Johnson kind of held us where we had been as other programs secured commitments from Top 100 guys.
 
Most seem to care most about the top 2 or 3 guys in the class. Quality matters much more than quantity. Frankly, our rating hasn't changed much since we got the early commitments from Scott and Gordon. Xavier Johnson kind of held us where we had been as other programs secured commitments from Top 100 guys.

Yeah, it really doesn't seem like anyone outside the top-100, maybe 150 players in the country will move the bar much, if at all.
 
I'm seriously in awe on how Tad was able to pull this off; most of it per to our run in the P12 tourney.
 
I'm seriously in awe on how Tad was able to pull this off; most of it per to our run in the P12 tourney.
I don't agree, we got one commit after the first signing cycle (Stalzer). Scott committed last March, Gordon committed in March as well, XJ was in October, and Talton was in November.
 
I think "per" is suppossed to be "prior". All the key players of the class were on board prior to the run in the PAC tourney.
 
I think "per" is suppossed to be "prior". All the key players of the class were on board prior to the run in the PAC tourney.
You are correct - I typed 'prior' but I must have typo'd & got autocorrected by the iPad.
 
Back
Top