What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

ESPN NCAAMB Top 100 Players

Shldr2Shldr

Club Member
Club Member
[h=3]No. 60: Josh Scott, Junior, Forward, Colorado | Score: 6.62[/h]
in_g_scott_mb_576x324.jpg
Ethan Miller/Getty Images

Scott is just about everything a coach might want from an ostensibly "solid" big man. He scores in the post, gets to the line, rebounds and defends without fouling. If Colorado has a successful 2014-15, Scott will be a major reason for it.

Great to see J40 get some love at #60
 
Disrespected.

No way in hell there are 59 players in college hoops that a coach would want on his team ahead of Josh Scott.

Absolute bull****.
 
"solid" The ****? Much more than solid, the kid is superlative. Show me a better post defender who commits fouls at or better Josh's rate. Show me a forward with a better set of moves in the paint. Show me a collegiate big who hits free throws like Josh. Has this dude even seen Jelly play?
 
Of course they havent seen jelly play, it's ESPN.

I agree, I was shocked to see him fall this low....
 
That NCAA beatdown really dropped the national perception of our players. We really looked inept in that game.
 
Can someone link me the list? I can't seem to find the whole thing, only 80-100. Might be my phone acting weird. Need to humor myself with what 59 players are ahead of Josh. Having not seen the list, I don't know exactly where I'd place him, but I reckon it would be much more like the 20 range, not 60.
 
Guess it depends on their methodology. If it was who are the best players right now, Josh should be a lot higher. If it's taking into account potential and all of that, then it's probably about right.
 
Can someone link me the list? I can't seem to find the whole thing, only 80-100. Might be my phone acting weird. Need to humor myself with what 59 players are ahead of Josh. Having not seen the list, I don't know exactly where I'd place him, but I reckon it would be much more like the 20 range, not 60.

They don't have the whole list yet.

Here is 40-59
 
Back
Top