Is this related to football?
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/ncaa/article/0,2777,DRMN_23932_5596497,00.html
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/ncaa/article/0,2777,DRMN_23932_5596497,00.html
Is this related to football?
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/ncaa/article/0,2777,DRMN_23932_5596497,00.html
:bs:
The institution, NCAA enforcement staff, and the infractions committee all found that the violations were inadvertent and discovered by the university's athletic staff, who promptly reported them to the NCAA. While the committee also emphasized in its report that the violations were "limited in nature and narrow in scope," they did constitute major violations due to the amount of extra benefits involved. The Committee on Infractions found the impermissible benefits for walk-on student-athletes occurred during the 2000-01 through 2005-06 academic years.
While the violations amounted to an extra benefit of $61,700, the committee felt the $100,000 sanction was more appropriate since the violations took place over six academic years and involved 133 student-athletes in six sports.
First, the ncaa did not impose scholarship sanctions on CU. CU self imposed them. :sad2: Second, Ceal Berry discovered the "problem" in 2005. So Hawk had nothing to do with it. Third, it sounds like it was across the athletic department board, not just football. It included women's soccer, tennis, men's basketball, etc. This is not a big deal, IMO. I wonder how many schools that do the same thing keep their ****ing mouths shut?
I wonder how many schools that do the same thing keep their ****ing mouths shut?
So if that is true, why is it only football scholarships being affected?
I agree with you Buff fans. That is some lame bull**** the NCAA pulled out of their asses! As stated earlier, OU and U$C get nodda for the **** they have pulled!
dont do the crime if you cant do the time... dont do it!
dont go to bed with no price on your head..... dont do it!
and keep your eyes on the shadows when the going gets narrow:smile2:
this is a non-story, 1 scholie and 100k, it was just your turn to pay homage to the NCAA godfather. every school has done something and to be honest CU has dodged a couple bullets recently, this was bound to happen.
dont do the crime if you cant do the time... dont do it!
dont go to bed with no price on your head..... dont do it!
and keep your eyes on the shadows when the going gets narrow:smile2:
this is a non-story, 1 scholie and 100k, it was just your turn to pay homage to the NCAA godfather. every school has done something and to be honest CU has dodged a couple bullets recently, this was bound to happen.
**** you smack. This is bull**** and you know it. Take the smug reply and shove up your ass.
smug? somebody needs a nappypoo.
how is it bull****? where there no infractions? you can debate the $$ amount but there were infractions.
if this is what happened to you guys, it'll be very interesting to see what happens to OU.
One scholarship. Seriously, is that even a big deal? Maybe. I don't know. We'll see I guess.
It's not just one scholarship, it's three. It's a reduction to 24 scholarships a year for three years. Will it make a difference? Hard to tell. In some years we don't have 24 scholarships to give anyway, so it will have no impact at all.
I also will be very, very interested to see what comes of the OU deal. I mean ****, if undercharging walk-on players a couple bucks per meal is worth this, what is having a couple players get paid for doing no work at all? :wow:
Or what of the Reggie Bush deal? Holy ****, the guy's agent bought him a ****ing house for God's sake. On the scale of "Big deals", that pretty well dwarfs what happened here.
If the NCAA doesn't come down like a ton of ****ing bricks on those two deals, it will only serve to prove that they are nothing more than a lackey to the big programs.