What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Nate Landman

sackman

Hates the Counting Crows.
Club Member
the blocked punt was awesome, but he was in for more than just special teams. He played well. I can’t recall if we have him playing inside or outside, but could he be the answer at ILB we have been looking for? He was very solid against a good USC squad.
 
The problem is he and Lewis both play the same position.
Then the coaches need to figure out how to get both of them on the field at the same time. Maybe that's moving Lewis to Buff Backer, or Landman to an outside position, if they are dead set on having Gamboa play 100% of the defensive snaps.
 
Landman's going to be a player here. Excited for the next 3 years of him.

Loved him as a recruit, so I can't say I'm surprised. But it's nice to see it translate on a much bigger level because you really never know.
 
Then the coaches need to figure out how to get both of them on the field at the same time. Maybe that's moving Lewis to Buff Backer, or Landman to an outside position, if they are dead set on having Gamboa play 100% of the defensive snaps.

I do not know what the solution is, but I think they are both good fits inside. The coaches need to be subbing Gamboa on obvious passing downs.
 
I do not know what the solution is, but I think they are both good fits inside. The coaches need to be subbing Gamboa on obvious passing downs.
Yep. I'd like to see a Gamboa-Landman rotation in 2018 similar to the Gamboa-Gillam rotation in 2016.
 
Could be interesting if Van Diest and/or Taylor are ready for snaps as well.
Yep. I think that would open up the opportunity to move Lewis around and have him as the 2nd OLB at times so he can pass rush from multiple looks. Would make a huge difference.
 
I do not know what the solution is, but I think they are both good fits inside. The coaches need to be subbing Gamboa on obvious passing downs.
I didn't mind gamboa's limitations nearly as much when he was coming out a lot to get Gillam on the field. Hope that sort of thing comes back.
 
I was noticing Mulumba a lot. If the light bulb has come on for him, certainly makes you feel better about next year.
I didn't want to get embroiled in whatever was in the game thread by offending someone with a positive comment, but one observation I had from that game is that Mulumba looked like a different guy from early in the season. Seems like he's starting to figure it out with his foundational techniques and responsibilities and is now able to start making some plays. Dude's got great hands.
 
I didn't want to get embroiled in whatever was in the game thread by offending someone with a positive comment, but one observation I had from that game is that Mulumba looked like a different guy from early in the season. Seems like he's starting to figure it out with his foundational techniques and responsibilities and is now able to start making some plays. Dude's got great hands.
not the kind of thing you want to be saying about a guy who was your starter all season (thanks Jeffcoat!) , but yea, positive development.
 
If Gamboa is still a starter next year then CU has big problems, so here is to hoping he is strictly situational.
 
There is just enough promise with the defense to make me believe they won’t be awful next year. I wish we could get a decent DC though. Eliot isn’t the answer.
 
The guys we recruited last year are starting to come around. Malumba and Tuiloma look to be serviceable, while the lbs and DBs look to be very solid.
Not to de-emphasize how they finish the 2018 recruiting class, though. Because while Javier and Mulumba look better as the season goes along, there's a real problem with depth and we need to be able to rotate 5 or 6 good players on the DL to be able to hold up against the Pac-12 pace and run games.
 
I didn't want to get embroiled in whatever was in the game thread by offending someone with a positive comment, but one observation I had from that game is that Mulumba looked like a different guy from early in the season. Seems like he's starting to figure it out with his foundational techniques and responsibilities and is now able to start making some plays. Dude's got great hands.
I think Mulumba has come a long way too. He was a victim of a nasty cut block on RJones TD run though...nasty.
 
Not to de-emphasize how they finish the 2018 recruiting class, though. Because while Javier and Mulumba look better as the season goes along, there's a real problem with depth and we need to be able to rotate 5 or 6 good players on the DL to be able to hold up against the Pac-12 pace and run games.
Agreed. But this wasn’t about recruiting. I’ll leave that discussion to others. My point was that the guys we have coming back have progressed as the year went on to the point where I’m comfortable that we won’t totally suck on defense next year. Injuries can, and often do, play a big role.
 
Back
Top