Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

BuffsNYC said:
:ROFLMAO:

I guarantee you that Stanford and Cal snobs do not overrate their football teams. They barely know they exist.
Click to expand...
I see your point, but the Pac-12 presidents thought that they were entitled to a 50 million dollar per school TV deal, and turned down a 30 million dollar deal.

It is fair to assume that the Stanford and Cal snobs were part of that process.
 
Agent Dave Kujan said:
I see your point, but the Pac-12 presidents thought that they were entitled to a 50 million dollar per school TV deal, and turned down a 30 million dollar deal.

It is fair to assume that the Stanford and Cal snobs were part of that process.
Click to expand...
So… 12 people from across the current P12 footprint now are represented solely by the attitude of two particular schools? Right
 
manhattanbuff said:
So… 12 people from across the current P12 footprint now are represented solely by the attitude of two particular schools? Right
Click to expand...
The original point is that the leadership at the SV schools and the leadership at the Texas schools would not have gotten along if Texas would have joined the Pac-12. I don’t see how anyone can feel differently.

But I’ll let you have the last word, I know that is really important to you.
 
Agent Dave Kujan said:
The original point is that the leadership at the SV schools and the leadership at the Texas schools would not have gotten along if Texas would have joined the Pac-12. I don’t see how anyone can feel differently.

But I’ll let you have the last word, I know that is really important to you.
Click to expand...
LOL. You’ve changed your point so many times now that there’s no need for me to get the last word. You just look worse after each post because you try to shoehorn your “snob” agenda as if you’re a proletarian.

Texas’ academic leadership is often at odds with Texas snobs ideologically. The problem is that the leadership has to deal with the Texas snobs because the snobs pay the bills.
 
manhattanbuff said:
LOL. You’ve changed your point so many times now that there’s no need for me to get the last word. You just look worse after each post because you try to shoehorn your “snob” agenda as if you’re a proletarian.

Texas’ academic leadership is often at odds with Texas snobs ideologically. The problem is that the leadership has to deal with the Texas snobs because the snobs pay the bills.
Click to expand...
Your right. Have a great day!
 
Agent Dave Kujan said:
But I’ll let you have the last word, I know that is really important to you.
Click to expand...
manhattanbuff said:
LOL. You’ve changed your point so many times now that there’s no need for me to get the last word.
Click to expand...
Hey assholes, you don’t need to tell someone they can have the last word, that sort of defeats the purpose - just stop posting.
1693752001349.gif
 
Buffnik said:
Remember the program boosters in Friday Night Lights? The "He's a big n, he won't break" scene when they wanted the HC to play the star RB on defense? These are the folks you are referring to - at least a significant portion of them are like that.
Click to expand...
Right on the money. I've unfortunately seen it first hand playing there.
 
Agent Dave Kujan said:
Kinda makes me want to be a communist.
Click to expand...
Join Us Gang Gang GIF
 
85alum said:
Interesting article on ESPN and media bundling. Will be interesting to see how this plays out in future conference media deals:
https://www.outkick.com/espn-charter-cable-bundle-sports/
Click to expand...
Been watching that. Charter is supposedly $2.2B a year to $DIS for its channel bundle that includes ESPN. CEO Bob Eiger has said he knows CableTV is dying and plans to aggressively keep increasing carriage fees to hold revenue levels in the interim. Once its dead he’ll move everything to ESPN+ and raise the prices and batten down the hatches. I think hes just going to end killing his rev stream.
 
MiamiBuffs said:
Been watching that. Charter is supposedly $2.2B a year to $DIS for its channel bundle that includes ESPN. CEO Bob Eiger has said he knows CableTV is dying and plans to aggressively keep increasing carriage fees to hold revenue levels in the interim. Once its dead he’ll move everything to ESPN+ and raise the prices and batten down the hatches. I think hes just going to end killing his rev stream.
Click to expand...

I'm a Spectrum cable and internet customer. It's been obvious for a while that they know cable is dying. They aggressively market their wireless phone and ISP businesses. I'd have cut the cable years ago were it not for the P12 network--so I guess it will be end of winter that I do it. As I understand it, Charter/Spectrum presently objects to Disney forcing them to buy all their ****ty channels along with ESPN more than the ESPN carriage rate. I'm very interested to see who blinks here--actually, I mean it will be interesting to see if Disney blinks.
 
BuffsNYC said:
I'm a Spectrum cable and internet customer. It's been obvious for a while that they know cable is dying. They aggressively market their wireless phone and ISP businesses. I'd have cut the cable years ago were it not for the P12 network--so I guess it will be end of winter that I do it. As I understand it, Charter/Spectrum presently objects to Disney forcing them to buy all their ****ty channels along with ESPN more than the ESPN carriage rate. I'm very interested to see who blinks here--actually, I mean it will be interesting to see if Disney blinks.
Click to expand...

Charter has some gigantic markets in their portfolio. Charter and I think a lot of cable would love to exit the TV business and focus on ISP business. Margins are likely a butt load better since they dont have to pay carriage fees as a middle man.

Disney is ****ed imho. They pay multiple billions per year in rights obligations. Not enough people will sign up to ESPN+ to cover that. I doubt they file BK but watch for ESPN to be sold for a song to someone with deep pockets. Eiger cant hold back shareholders as parks over perform and that money then subsidizes TV.
 
MiamiBuffs said:
Charter has some gigantic markets in their portfolio. Disney is ****ed imho. Charter and I think a lot of cable would love to exit the TV business and focus on ISP business. Margins are likely a butt load better since they dont have to pay carriage fees as a middle man.
Click to expand...

Yep, it's a fascinating fight over the dwindling pie that is the cable business. Both Disney and the cable companies know the business is dying, but both are trying to squeeze all the profit out of it that they can. It seems obvious that Charter/Spectrum is either going to get what they want from Disney for the next few years or they are just going to exit the cable TV business. Several smaller cable companies have already done so and negotiated some nominal discount for their customers to receive youtubeTV.
 
Just read that long article.

Charter's business is now pretty much its broadband business and they are able to tell ESPN to go screw themselves. 15 million customers are left to decide if they want to continue watching ESPN on YouTube TV or Sling TV or whoever carries ESPN.

I am unable to shed a tiny drop of tear because ESPN has played a big part in the realignment chaos.

I guess Apple will buy ESPN sooner than later and I will subscribe to ESPN whenever I want to.
 
PAC MAN said:
Just read that long article.

Charter's business is now pretty much its broadband business and they are able to tell ESPN to go screw themselves. 15 million customers are left to decide if they want to continue watching ESPN on YouTube TV or Sling TV or whoever carries ESPN.

I am unable to shed a tiny drop of tear because ESPN has played a big part in the realignment chaos.

I guess Apple will buy ESPN sooner than later and I will subscribe to ESPN whenever I want to.
Click to expand...
Yes but, it won't be 15 million customers who sign up for another service to watch ESPN. It will be a lot less than that, possibly a very small amount will sign up. Many just are not going to care as they are not sports fans and can live without ESPN.

That is why this is a much bigger problem for ESPN than it is for charter. Charter can offer a $15 credit for anyone calling to complain, while ESPN loses 10s of millions per month on all those carriage fees from non ESPN watchers.
 
jaybird said:
Yes but, it won't be 15 million customers who sign up for another service to watch ESPN. It will be a lot less than that, possibly a very small amount will sign up. Many just are not going to care as they are not sports fans and can live without ESPN.

That is why this is a much bigger problem for ESPN than it is for charter. Charter can offer a $15 credit for anyone calling to complain, while ESPN loses 10s of millions per month on all those carriage fees from non ESPN watchers.
Click to expand...

True and who is going to shed tears for ESPN? Not me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top